SDG 17 - "Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development"
Global progress on SDG 17 has shown both advancement and persistent challenges over the past decade. While financial flows to developing countries have increased, driven by both official and private finance, but record-high debt servicing costs in 2023 strain low- and middle-income economies. This is compounded by a $4 trillion annual investment gap for SDG achievement in developing countries. Access to information and communications technology has grown steadily, although digital divides remain stark, particularly in lower-income regions. While data systems and national statistical capacities have improved, but many countries still struggle to secure the necessary funding to fully track and implement the SDGs, slowing progress in key areas. Strengthened support and renewed global cooperation are critical to bridge these divides and accelerate SDG progress. Through initiatives such as the SDG Stimulus, the Joint SDG Fund, the Technology Facilitation Mechanism, and the Global SDG Indicator Framework, the UN is helping to build partnerships to close financing gaps, expand access to science, innovation, and data, and support developing countries—alongside international financial institutions—in unlocking capital and investment for SDG implementation and accelerating inclusive progress on the 2030 Agenda.
To support accelerated progress toward SDG 17, this section presents a set of evidence‑based initiatives, followed by tailored recommendations presented by country context, i.e., countries classified by the World Bank as low‑income, middle‑income, high‑income, and fragile/conflict‑affected states (FCAS). These key recommendations recognise that countries face different constraints and opportunities, and therefore require differentiated policy and financing approaches.
Strengthen domestic resource mobilisation, including through international support to developing countries, to improve domestic capacity for tax and other revenue collection
17.1.1 - Total government revenue as a proportion of GDP, by source.
17.1.2 - Proportion of domestic budget funded by domestic taxes.
Relevance: Efficient tax systems are fundamental for sustainable economic development, ensuring governments can generate adequate revenue to fund essential services, infrastructure, and social programs. Sustainable Development Goal 17.1 focuses on strengthening tax system efficiency by improving revenue collection and financial management. An optimised tax system enhances transparency, reduces tax evasion, and minimises administrative burdens, allowing governments to allocate funds effectively while promoting equitable economic growth. By adopting modernised tax policies, digital tools, and streamlined compliance frameworks, nations can significantly improve their fiscal health and public financial management.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Tax Inspectors Without Borders (TIWB) program, launched by the OECD and UNDP, assists developing countries in strengthening their tax audit capabilities, leading to increased tax revenue from multinational corporations. Estonia’s e-Tax system has revolutionised tax administration by providing a fully digital, user-friendly platform for tax filing and compliance, reducing tax evasion and improving efficiency. Rwanda’s electronic tax filing system has streamlined tax collection, boosting revenue and reducing administrative costs. The African Tax Administration Forum (ATAF) supports capacity-building for tax administrators in Africa, promoting effective tax policy implementation and cross-border cooperation. These initiatives demonstrate that technological innovation, international collaboration, and strong regulatory frameworks are key to improving tax efficiency and financial management.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa faces challenges such as informal economies, weak enforcement, and limited digital infrastructure, resulting in significant revenue losses. South Asia, including countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh, struggles with low tax compliance due to complex regulatory frameworks and informal labor markets. Latin American countries such as Guatemala and Honduras experience widespread tax evasion, exacerbated by weak institutional governance and inadequate auditing mechanisms. Conflict-affected nations, including Yemen and Afghanistan, face difficulties in tax administration due to political instability and economic disruptions. Strengthening tax system efficiency in these regions would enhance financial stability, improve public service delivery, and reduce dependency on external aid.
Future challenges: Widespread tax evasion and illicit financial flows undermine government revenue, requiring robust enforcement mechanisms and international cooperation. The digital divide limits the adoption of automated tax systems in low-income countries, making tax collection processes inefficient. Political resistance to tax reforms in many regions hampers progress, with vested interests opposing transparency and financial accountability measures. Administrative inefficiencies, including outdated tax laws and complex procedures, discourage tax compliance and increase costs for businesses. Addressing these challenges necessitates investments in technology, strengthened governance frameworks, and targeted policy reforms to enhance revenue generation.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Transparent governance is essential for ensuring public trust, preventing corruption, and fostering responsible financial management. Sustainable Development Goal 17.1 emphasises strengthening public sector transparency to improve accountability in government spending. By implementing clear reporting mechanisms, open budgeting practices, and anti-corruption policies, governments can enhance oversight and ensure that public funds are utilised efficiently and ethically. Strong financial accountability safeguards national resources, supports sustainable development, and empowers citizens to engage in governance.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Open Government Partnership (OGP) encourages governments to adopt transparent governance models by promoting participatory budgeting and public financial disclosures. The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) improves accountability in resource-rich nations by requiring governments and companies to disclose revenues from natural resource extraction. Brazil’s Transparency Portal provides real-time access to government expenditures, enabling citizens to track public spending. The European Union’s Integrity Pacts facilitate corruption-free procurement processes by ensuring independent monitoring of government contracts. These initiatives highlight the effectiveness of digital transparency tools, public engagement, and international collaboration in strengthening accountability.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa experiences challenges with weak institutional frameworks, leading to corruption in procurement and resource allocation. Southeast Asia faces issues with limited public access to government financial records, reducing fiscal transparency. Latin American nations, including Venezuela and Nicaragua, have reported cases of restricted oversight in government expenditures, exacerbating economic instability. Conflict-affected regions, including Syria and South Sudan, suffer from a lack of financial accountability due to political unrest and weak governance structures. Strengthening transparency measures in these areas would help combat corruption, promote economic stability, and ensure responsible public financial management.
Future challenges: Corruption and financial mismanagement persist in many governments, weakening efforts to ensure fiscal accountability. Limited public access to financial data reduces oversight and restricts citizen engagement in governance. Political resistance to transparency reforms can obstruct progress, particularly in nations with entrenched authoritarian systems. Technological barriers prevent the widespread adoption of digital transparency platforms, limiting access to real-time financial disclosures. Addressing these challenges requires strong policy enforcement, digital innovation, and global cooperation to establish financial integrity and transparency in government operations.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Expanding access to banking and financial services is a cornerstone of economic development, enabling individuals and businesses to participate in formal financial systems, secure savings, and access credit. Sustainable Development Goal 17.1 highlights financial inclusion as a key driver of poverty reduction, entrepreneurship, and economic stability. By strengthening banking infrastructure, promoting digital financial services, and reducing barriers to access, nations can empower marginalised communities, enhance financial literacy, and foster long-term economic resilience. Inclusive financial systems reduce income inequality, support small businesses, and contribute to overall economic growth.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: Kenya’s M-Pesa revolutionized digital financial access by providing mobile banking services to millions without traditional bank accounts. India’s Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY) expanded banking services to rural populations, ensuring universal access to financial resources. The Alliance for Financial Inclusion (AFI) supports policy initiatives to strengthen banking access in developing nations, promoting regulatory reforms that facilitate financial inclusion. Brazil’s Correspondent Banking model allows financial services to be offered through local businesses, improving rural access to banking. These programs demonstrate how innovative financial solutions, regulatory support, and digital advancements can enhance economic inclusion.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa experiences low banking penetration due to limited infrastructure and high transaction costs, restricting access to financial services for rural populations. Southeast Asia, including countries like Myanmar and Cambodia, struggles with low financial literacy and inadequate digital banking adoption. Latin American nations, particularly Venezuela and Haiti, face economic instability that limits trust in financial institutions. Conflict-affected regions, such as Afghanistan and Syria, suffer from disrupted banking systems and restricted financial access due to political instability. Strengthening financial inclusion in these areas would provide economic security, improve investment opportunities, and empower vulnerable populations.
Future challenges: Limited financial literacy hinders individuals from effectively utilising banking services, reducing economic participation. High banking fees and transaction costs discourage low-income populations from accessing financial services. Regulatory barriers, including restrictive banking policies, prevent the expansion of inclusive financial solutions in many regions. Political instability disrupts financial systems, making it difficult to establish reliable banking infrastructure. Addressing these challenges requires investment in financial education, policy reforms, and technological innovation to improve financial accessibility.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Developed countries to implement fully their official development assistance commitments, including the commitment by many developed countries to achieve the target of 0.7 per cent of ODA/GNI to developing countries and 0.15 to 0.20 per cent of ODA/GNI to least developed countries; ODA providers are encouraged to consider setting a target to provide at least 0.20 per cent of ODA/GNI to least developed countries
17.2.1 - Net official development assistance, total and to least developed countries, as a proportion of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Development Assistance Committee donors’ gross national income (GNI).
Relevance: Official Development Assistance (ODA) is a vital mechanism for supporting economic growth, poverty reduction, and humanitarian relief in developing nations. Sustainable Development Goal 17.2 emphasises the necessity for developed countries to uphold their global aid commitments and meet established ODA targets. By fulfilling these financial pledges, high-income nations can strengthen international cooperation, provide critical resources for sustainable projects, and ensure equitable progress toward development goals. Reliable aid commitments foster stability, improve infrastructure, and enhance social services in regions struggling with economic hardship, climate crises, and conflict.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria utilises international aid to combat infectious diseases and strengthen healthcare systems in developing nations. The World Bank’s International Development Association (IDA) provides concessional financing to low-income countries, enabling investments in education, infrastructure, and climate resilience. The European Union’s aid program supports governance and economic development across Africa, Asia, and Latin America. The United Nations Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) ensures rapid financial assistance for humanitarian crises, reinforcing disaster recovery and crisis management. These programs highlight the role of ODA in sustaining global development, alleviating poverty, and enhancing resilience in vulnerable regions.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa continues to face challenges in healthcare, infrastructure, and economic development due to fluctuating aid contributions. South Asia, particularly Bangladesh and Nepal, requires sustained financial support to address poverty and environmental vulnerabilities. Fragile states such as Yemen, Afghanistan, and Somalia struggle with unstable governance, limiting effective use of aid resources. The Pacific Islands face significant climate risks, necessitating greater financial commitments from developed nations for adaptation and disaster preparedness. Strengthening aid contributions in these regions would accelerate progress toward sustainable development goals, ensuring long-term socio-economic stability.
Future challenges: Insufficient aid fulfilment from developed nations hampers progress, delaying poverty alleviation and economic stabilisation in recipient countries. Geopolitical shifts and economic crises often lead to reductions in ODA contributions, disrupting development programs. Inefficiencies in aid distribution and transparency reduce the effectiveness of financial assistance, limiting impact. Public skepticism toward foreign aid in donor nations can hinder policy commitments and funding allocations. Addressing these challenges requires reinforced accountability, sustainable financing strategies, and strengthened multilateral cooperation to uphold global aid commitments.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Least Developed Countries (LDCs) face significant economic, social, and environmental challenges that hinder sustainable development. These nations often struggle with high poverty rates, weak infrastructure, limited access to healthcare and education, and vulnerability to climate change. Sustainable Development Goal 17.2 emphasises the need for developed countries to prioritise aid for these vulnerable nations, ensuring they receive sufficient financial and technical support to overcome development barriers. By committing targeted resources to LDCs, the global community can promote economic resilience, strengthen governance, and facilitate long-term progress toward sustainable development.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Enhanced Integrated Framework (EIF) assists LDCs in developing trade capacity and integrating into the global economy, fostering economic growth. The Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF), managed by the Global Environment Facility (GEF), provides targeted financial support for climate adaptation projects in vulnerable nations. The UN Technology Bank for LDCs facilitates knowledge-sharing and technological innovation to enhance sustainable development efforts. The International Development Association (IDA) offers concessional financing to LDCs, enabling investments in essential services such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure. These programs highlight the role of sustained financial aid, technological assistance, and capacity-building in supporting LDCs' development.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa, including Chad, Madagascar, and Malawi, struggles with severe poverty and limited infrastructure, necessitating enhanced financial support. South Asia, particularly Nepal and Bhutan, faces economic constraints and climate vulnerabilities that demand sustained aid interventions. The Pacific Island nations, including Tuvalu and Kiribati, are highly susceptible to climate change, requiring targeted adaptation funding. Conflict-affected LDCs, such as Sudan and Haiti, suffer from governance instability and humanitarian crises, limiting effective development. Strengthening aid allocations to these regions would accelerate sustainable growth and improve resilience in vulnerable communities.
Future challenges: Insufficient funding commitments from donor nations restrict development progress and exacerbate economic disparities. Bureaucratic inefficiencies and governance instability in LDCs hinder effective aid utilisation. Climate change disproportionately impacts LDCs, requiring urgent financial interventions for adaptation and disaster recovery. Public skepticism and shifting geopolitical priorities in donor countries affect ODA contributions, delaying sustainable development initiatives. Addressing these challenges necessitates consistent financial commitments, improved transparency, and strategic policy reforms to maximise aid effectiveness.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Strong international cooperation is essential for addressing global challenges such as poverty, climate change, inequality, and economic instability. Sustainable Development Goal17.2 emphasises the need to strengthen global partnerships to facilitate sustainable development, ensuring that nations collaborate to share resources, expertise, and financial support. By fostering inclusive economic growth, technological innovation, and capacity-building efforts, international cooperation enables countries to advance sustainable solutions that benefit both local and global communities. Effective partnerships help bridge developmental gaps, enhance resilience, and drive progress toward achieving sustainability goals worldwide.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Paris Agreement unites countries in combating climate change by setting legally binding commitments and supporting climate financing. The Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC) promotes coordinated international assistance, ensuring aid effectiveness and inclusivity in global development efforts. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) facilitates infrastructure projects across Asia, Africa, and Europe, improving connectivity and economic integration. The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) fosters regional economic cooperation, advancing trade opportunities and sustainable growth across African nations. These programs demonstrate how cross-border collaboration enhances economic resilience, environmental sustainability, and global development initiatives.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa faces challenges in securing infrastructure financing and integrating into global trade networks. Small Island Developing States (SIDS), including nations in the Caribbean and Pacific, struggle with climate-related vulnerabilities that necessitate increased collaboration on environmental adaptation strategies. South Asia, including countries such as Nepal and Sri Lanka, requires enhanced regional partnerships to improve economic integration and sustainability efforts. Conflict-affected regions, including Afghanistan and Syria, need coordinated humanitarian assistance and post-crisis rebuilding strategies to support long-term stability. Strengthening partnerships in these areas would facilitate inclusive economic growth, environmental protection, and improved living standards.
Future challenges: Geopolitical tensions and economic protectionism often disrupt global partnerships, limiting sustainable development initiatives. Funding shortfalls and inconsistent aid commitments weaken collaborative efforts, reducing effectiveness in addressing developmental challenges. Bureaucratic inefficiencies slow cross-border agreements, preventing seamless knowledge-sharing and capacity-building efforts. Climate change and global health crises necessitate urgent international responses, yet coordination often faces delays due to political complexities. Addressing these challenges requires strengthened diplomatic relations, financial commitments, and innovative multilateral strategies to enhance global cooperation for sustainability.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Mobilise additional financial resources for developing countries from multiple sources
17.3.1 - Additional financial resources mobilised for developing countries from multiple sources.
17.3.2 - Volume of remittances (in United States dollars) as a proportion of total GDP.
Relevance: Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) plays a vital role in economic growth, job creation, and infrastructure development, making it a key component of Sustainable Development Goal 17.3. Encouraging responsible private sector investment ensures that capital inflows support long-term sustainability, ethical business practices, and inclusive economic development. By fostering regulatory transparency, environmental stewardship, and corporate responsibility, nations can attract investment that not only drives profits but also enhances societal well-being. Responsible FDI strengthens industrial capacity, improves innovation, and integrates economies into global markets while safeguarding human rights and environmental protections.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: Several initiatives have successfully promoted responsible FDI worldwide. The UN Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) encourage companies to integrate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations into their investment decisions. The World Bank’s International Finance Corporation (IFC) supports sustainable private sector projects, ensuring financial viability while advancing social impact. The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises set ethical standards for global business operations, emphasising corporate accountability and fair labor practices. The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) fosters responsible cross-border investments by enhancing regulatory alignment and market access. These programs demonstrate how international standards, ethical investment frameworks, and public-private collaboration can drive sustainable FDI.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa experiences inconsistent regulatory enforcement, leading to investments that may exploit resources without benefiting local populations. Southeast Asia, including countries like Cambodia and Myanmar, struggles with weak labor protections and environmental sustainability in foreign-led industries. Latin American nations, particularly Bolivia and Ecuador, require enhanced investment governance to curb extractive industries’ negative social impacts. Conflict-affected regions, such as Yemen and Syria, face challenges in attracting stable FDI due to political instability and weak institutional frameworks. Strengthening responsible investment strategies in these areas would promote economic stability and equitable development.
Future challenges: Weak governance structures and corruption reduce investor confidence, limiting the effectiveness of investment policies. Environmental risks, including deforestation and resource exploitation, necessitate stricter regulations to ensure sustainable investment. The digital divide hinders technology-based investments in many regions, preventing equitable access to innovative financial solutions. Global economic volatility, including market fluctuations and geopolitical uncertainties, affects investor commitments to long-term projects. Addressing these challenges requires strong legal frameworks, enhanced corporate accountability, and sustainable financing mechanisms to ensure ethical investment practices.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Traditional funding models alone are insufficient to meet the growing financial needs for global development. Sustainable Development Goal 17.3 emphasises the need for innovative financing mechanisms to mobilise new resources and expand financial accessibility for critical development initiatives. By leveraging blended finance, impact investing, and digital financial technologies, nations can bridge funding gaps, support infrastructure projects, and drive sustainable economic growth. Innovative financing strengthens resilience, enhances investment efficiency, and promotes social impact while ensuring long-term financial sustainability.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: Several innovative financing mechanisms have successfully advanced global development efforts. The Green Bond Initiative mobilises private sector investment for environmental projects, promoting climate resilience and sustainable infrastructure. The Global Innovation Fund (GIF) supports social enterprises and startups that address development challenges through scalable business models. The International Finance Facility for Education (IFFEd) blends public and private funding to expand educational access in low-income nations. The UN’s Debt-for-Nature Swaps enable developing countries to reduce sovereign debt in exchange for environmental conservation commitments. These initiatives showcase the effectiveness of alternative financing strategies in fostering sustainable development.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa faces constraints in attracting impact investors due to perceived financial risks and limited market infrastructure. South Asia, including Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, struggles with limited access to blended finance models that could drive sustainable economic expansion. Small Island Developing States (SIDS), particularly in the Caribbean and Pacific, require tailored financing mechanisms to address climate adaptation and disaster recovery needs. Conflict-affected nations, such as Yemen and Sudan, face difficulties in accessing global capital due to governance instability and economic fragility. Strengthening innovative financing strategies in these areas would unlock new funding opportunities and enhance development outcomes.
Future challenges: Limited financial literacy and investment expertise hinder the adoption of alternative funding models. Regulatory complexities and inconsistent policies across nations create barriers to scalable financing initiatives. Economic instability and market fluctuations affect investor confidence, reducing capital flow into high-risk development projects. Technological infrastructure constraints in many regions slow the adoption of digital finance solutions that could improve access to capital. Addressing these challenges requires targeted policy reforms, enhanced financial sector partnerships, and strengthened investment incentives to maximise funding opportunities for development.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Fair and sustainable debt management is crucial for the economic stability of developing nations, ensuring that financial agreements support long-term growth rather than contributing to cycles of dependency and crisis. Sustainable Development Goal 17.3 highlights the importance of responsible lending practices, transparent financial agreements, and debt relief strategies to prevent excessive debt burdens. By fostering equitable financing conditions, developing nations can invest in infrastructure, education, healthcare, and climate resilience without risking economic instability. Strengthening debt sustainability safeguards financial autonomy and promotes inclusive development.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative, led by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank, provides debt relief to nations struggling with unsustainable debt levels. The Paris Club negotiates fair debt restructuring agreements, enabling developing nations to manage repayments effectively. The Debt Service Suspension Initiative (DSSI), launched by the G20, temporarily halted debt payments for low-income nations during economic crises, allowing governments to redirect resources to essential services. The Common Framework for Debt Treatments extends support for countries requiring long-term debt restructuring. These initiatives illustrate how coordinated global efforts can ensure financial stability and economic resilience.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa, particularly countries like Zambia and Ghana, faces rising debt-to-GDP ratios, limiting economic growth and public service investments. Latin American nations, including Argentina and Ecuador, experience recurring debt crises, necessitating more stable financial agreements. South Asian countries such as Sri Lanka and Pakistan grapple with high external debt that constrains development financing. Small Island Developing States (SIDS), including nations in the Caribbean and Pacific, require debt relief mechanisms to address climate-related vulnerabilities and economic instability. Strengthening fair lending practices and responsible debt management in these regions would enhance financial resilience and development opportunities.
Future challenges: Unsustainable borrowing practices and high-interest debt agreements increase financial strain on developing nations, limiting their capacity for economic growth. Global economic volatility, including inflation and fluctuating interest rates, complicates debt repayment strategies. Limited transparency in financial agreements prevents accountability in lending practices, leading to burdensome repayment terms. Political instability in debt-burdened nations further restricts economic planning and repayment strategies. Addressing these challenges requires coordinated financial governance, responsible lending practices, and enhanced debt management policies to ensure fair and sustainable financial agreements.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Assist developing countries in attaining long-term debt sustainability through coordinated policies aimed at fostering debt financing, debt relief and debt restructuring, as appropriate, and address the external debt of highly indebted poor countries to reduce debt distress
Relevance: Debt relief initiatives play a crucial role in supporting economic stability, reducing financial burdens, and enabling sustainable development in struggling nations. Sustainable Development Goal 17.4 emphasises the need to strengthen programs that alleviate unsustainable debt levels, allowing countries to invest in essential services such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure. By promoting fair and transparent debt restructuring, international financial institutions and donor countries can assist low-income and crisis-affected nations in stabilising their economies, fostering long-term growth, and preventing cycles of financial distress.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative, launched by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank, provides comprehensive debt relief to nations with excessive external debt burdens, enabling them to redirect resources toward social development. The Paris Club facilitates debt restructuring agreements between creditor nations and debtor countries, ensuring fair repayment conditions and long-term financial sustainability. The Debt Service Suspension Initiative (DSSI), introduced by the G20, temporarily paused debt payments for low-income countries during global economic crises, providing immediate fiscal relief. The Common Framework for Debt Treatments extends debt assistance beyond the DSSI period, allowing countries to negotiate fair repayment schedules and prevent excessive financial burdens. These programs highlight how coordinated global efforts can mitigate economic distress and promote responsible financial governance.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa, including Zambia, Ethiopia, and Chad, struggles with high external debt levels that restrict economic development and investment capacity. Latin American nations such as Argentina and Venezuela face recurring debt crises, requiring sustained restructuring programs to stabilise financial conditions. South Asian countries, including Sri Lanka and Pakistan, experience significant sovereign debt burdens that hinder progress in social and infrastructure development. Small Island Developing States (SIDS), such as those in the Caribbean and Pacific, require targeted debt relief programs to address climate-related financial vulnerabilities. Strengthening debt relief efforts in these regions would promote financial stability and unlock development potential.
Future challenges: Limited coordination among creditor nations and international financial institutions slows debt restructuring processes. Uncertain global economic conditions, including inflation and interest rate fluctuations, complicate debt repayment agreements. Political instability in debt-burdened nations restricts transparent financial governance, preventing effective debt management. Public skepticism toward large-scale debt relief initiatives affects donor country commitments, limiting support for financially distressed nations. Addressing these challenges requires strengthened multilateral cooperation, responsible lending practices, and enhanced financial governance to ensure fair and sustainable debt solutions.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Fair lending and borrowing policies are fundamental to maintaining financial stability, promoting economic growth, and ensuring that debt does not lead to excessive financial burdens. Sustainable Development Goal 17.4 emphasises responsible financial agreements that protect borrowers from exploitative practices and encourage ethical lending from financial institutions. By enforcing transparency, equitable interest rates, and regulatory safeguards, nations can prevent debt crises, strengthen financial inclusion, and promote trust in financial systems. Strong fair lending policies foster sustainable economic development, enhance investor confidence, and reduce inequalities in access to credit.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Basel III framework sets international banking standards to prevent risky lending practices and ensure financial stability. The Responsible Finance Forum, supported by the World Bank, promotes ethical financial services, particularly in low-income and underserved communities. The Equator Principles establish responsible lending guidelines for financial institutions engaged in large-scale project financing, ensuring environmental and social considerations are upheld. The Fair Lending Act in the United States enforces protections against discriminatory lending practices, ensuring equitable access to credit. These programs highlight the effectiveness of strong financial regulations, transparent lending policies, and consumer protections in promoting fair financial agreements.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa experiences limited consumer protections, leading to high-interest loans and predatory lending practices. Southeast Asia, including countries like the Philippines and Indonesia, struggles with informal lending markets that operate without regulatory oversight, increasing financial risks for borrowers. Latin American nations, particularly Brazil and Argentina, require improved lending transparency to curb excessive debt accumulation among businesses and individuals. Conflict-affected regions, such as Afghanistan and Yemen, face challenges in financial stability, requiring stronger protections against exploitative credit agreements. Strengthening fair lending frameworks in these areas would enhance financial inclusion and economic resilience.
Future challenges: Predatory lending and excessive interest rates disproportionately affect vulnerable populations, leading to cycles of debt dependency. Regulatory enforcement varies across nations, allowing unethical financial practices to persist in under-regulated markets. Financial literacy gaps prevent individuals from making informed borrowing decisions, increasing risks of financial instability. Global economic uncertainties, including inflation and market volatility, affect lending conditions, making responsible borrowing more challenging. Addressing these challenges requires strengthened financial education, regulatory reforms, and consumer protections to ensure responsible lending and borrowing practices.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Economic stability is fundamental for sustainable development, ensuring that nations can withstand financial shocks, maintain steady growth, and invest in long-term prosperity. Sustainable Development Goal 17.4 highlights the importance of economic stability measures that support financial resilience, protect against crises, and enhance fiscal sustainability. By strengthening governance frameworks, promoting sound monetary policies, and encouraging responsible financial planning, countries can safeguard their economies from volatility while fostering inclusive economic progress. Ensuring financial resilience empowers nations to build strong social and economic foundations that drive long-term stability.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The International Monetary Fund (IMF) offers financial assistance and economic policy guidance to nations facing fiscal instability, helping them navigate crises and establish sound financial structures. The World Bank’s Development Policy Financing provides countries with strategic funding to support governance reforms and long-term economic resilience. The European Stability Mechanism (ESM) ensures financial security in the Eurozone by offering support to member states experiencing economic distress. The African Union’s Macroeconomic Policy Framework promotes regional economic coordination to enhance financial sustainability across African nations. These initiatives illustrate how coordinated efforts, financial governance, and strategic policy implementation can reinforce economic resilience.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa faces challenges such as inflation, exchange rate volatility, and external debt burdens that limit economic progress. Latin American nations, including Argentina and Venezuela, experience economic instability due to fluctuating currency values and financial crises. Small Island Developing States (SIDS), particularly those in the Caribbean and Pacific, struggle with financial sustainability due to economic dependence on tourism and vulnerability to climate change. Conflict-affected regions, including Afghanistan and Sudan, require strengthened financial frameworks to stabilise economies recovering from political unrest. Enhancing financial resilience in these areas would promote economic security and facilitate long-term sustainable growth.
Future challenges: Global economic uncertainty, including inflation, recessions, and financial market volatility, complicates long-term financial planning. Weak institutional governance and corruption restrict policy effectiveness, reducing economic resilience. External debt dependency limits fiscal autonomy, requiring fair and sustainable lending agreements. Climate change and geopolitical instability pose financial risks that disrupt economic security and investment confidence. Addressing these challenges requires strengthened fiscal policies, global cooperation, and innovative financial strategies that enhance resilience and long-term stability.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Adopt and implement investment promotion regimes for least developed countries
17.5.1 - Number of countries that adopt and implement investment promotion regimes for developing countries, including the least developed countries.
Relevance: Encouraging private sector investment in emerging markets is essential for driving economic growth, fostering innovation, and creating employment opportunities. Sustainable Development Goal 17.5 emphasises the need to strengthen private sector engagement to enhance financial inclusion, develop infrastructure, and boost entrepreneurial activity in underserved regions. By implementing investor-friendly policies, improving market accessibility, and ensuring regulatory transparency, nations can attract responsible private investment that supports long-term sustainable development. A dynamic private sector contributes to economic diversification, enhances productivity, and accelerates global progress toward equitable growth.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The World Bank’s International Finance Corporation (IFC) provides strategic funding and advisory services to businesses expanding into developing economies. The Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN) facilitates responsible private investments that generate both financial returns and positive social impact. The African Development Bank’s Private Sector Development Strategy supports infrastructure and entrepreneurship initiatives to strengthen market potential across Africa. The Asian Development Bank’s Trade and Supply Chain Finance Program enhances access to financial resources for businesses in developing nations, ensuring sustainable market integration. These programs showcase how targeted investment strategies and public-private cooperation can drive economic progress in emerging markets.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa faces limited foreign investment due to infrastructure gaps and regulatory uncertainties. South Asia, including Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, struggles with inconsistent policy frameworks that hinder investor confidence. Latin American nations, particularly Bolivia and Ecuador, require improved financial accessibility to enhance private sector participation. Conflict-affected regions, such as Yemen and Sudan, face instability that discourages investment, requiring targeted financial mechanisms to mitigate risks. Strengthening investor-friendly policies and institutional frameworks in these areas would promote sustainable economic expansion and job creation.
Future challenges: Political instability and weak governance structures limit investment confidence, restricting market opportunities. Inadequate infrastructure and unreliable financial systems deter private investment, hindering economic expansion. Limited access to financing and credit reduces entrepreneurship in emerging markets, slowing business growth. Global economic volatility and shifting trade policies create uncertainties that affect long-term investment decisions. Addressing these challenges requires strategic policy reforms, innovative financing mechanisms, and enhanced international collaboration to attract responsible private investment.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Robust infrastructure is a cornerstone of sustainable development, facilitating economic activity, improving public services, and enhancing connectivity within and between nations. Sustainable Development Goal 17.5 emphasises the need to strengthen infrastructure in developing countries to support long-term growth, reduce inequality, and improve resilience. By investing in roads, energy networks, digital connectivity, and water systems, nations can create economic opportunities, enhance trade potential, and foster inclusive development. Well-planned infrastructure projects ensure stability, enable industrialisation, and empower local communities by providing essential services and facilitating productivity.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) invests in large-scale infrastructure projects across Asia, Africa, and Latin America, improving transportation networks and economic integration. The Global Infrastructure Facility (GIF), led by the World Bank, mobilises private sector investments to fund sustainable infrastructure in emerging markets. The African Development Bank’s Infrastructure Action Plan focuses on modernising transport, energy, and water systems across the continent to accelerate regional economic growth. The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Connectivity Blueprint promotes cross-border infrastructure projects to enhance trade and economic cooperation. These initiatives showcase the transformative potential of well-structured infrastructure programs in developing economies.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa faces challenges related to weak transportation networks, limited energy access, and inadequate digital infrastructure. South Asia, including Bangladesh and Nepal, struggles with outdated urban planning and insufficient connectivity for rural communities. Small Island Developing States (SIDS), particularly those in the Pacific and Caribbean, require enhanced infrastructure resilience to withstand climate impacts. Conflict-affected regions, including Yemen and Sudan, face disruptions in basic service delivery, necessitating targeted infrastructure recovery programs. Strengthening infrastructure investments in these regions would unlock economic potential, improve livelihoods, and accelerate progress toward sustainable development.
Future challenges: Limited financial resources and investment gaps hinder large-scale infrastructure projects in low-income nations. Political instability and governance challenges prevent effective project implementation and long-term maintenance. Environmental concerns, including climate risks and ecological impacts, require sustainable infrastructure solutions to mitigate negative effects. Rapid urbanisation in developing nations creates demand for resilient infrastructure that meets growing population needs. Addressing these challenges requires coordinated planning, increased financial commitments, and innovative engineering solutions to build long-term infrastructure resilience.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Expanding trade and market access is essential for fostering economic growth, creating employment opportunities, and ensuring fair participation in global commerce. Sustainable Development Goal 17.5 underscores the importance of improving trade conditions to enhance market integration, reduce trade barriers, and empower developing nations to compete in international markets. By fostering trade agreements, modernising logistics, and strengthening regulatory frameworks, countries can unlock new economic opportunities, diversify trade relationships, and promote sustainable development through commerce.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) Aid for Trade program supports developing countries in overcoming trade barriers, improving capacity, and enhancing export competitiveness. The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) facilitates intra-African trade by reducing tariffs and harmonising trade regulations. The European Union’s Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) offers trade incentives to developing nations, ensuring preferential market access. The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) promotes trade liberalisation and facilitates seamless cross-border commerce. These initiatives demonstrate how strategic trade policies and economic partnerships can enhance market participation globally.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa faces logistical challenges, high tariffs, and weak export competitiveness, limiting market integration. Small Island Developing States (SIDS), including nations in the Caribbean and Pacific, struggle with geographic trade disadvantages that necessitate improved connectivity and cost-efficient shipping. South Asian countries, including Nepal and Bangladesh, require enhanced regulatory cooperation and modernised port infrastructure to boost trade performance. Conflict-affected nations, such as Afghanistan and Syria, face disrupted trade flows due to political instability and weak governance frameworks. Strengthening market access in these regions would unlock economic potential, improve resilience, and drive sustainable growth.
Future challenges: Protectionist trade policies and geopolitical tensions restrict market expansion, reducing economic opportunities for developing nations. Inadequate infrastructure and outdated transportation networks limit trade efficiency and competitiveness. Complex regulatory environments and bureaucratic trade procedures hinder seamless international transactions. Global economic instability and fluctuating commodity prices pose risks to long-term trade viability. Addressing these challenges requires enhanced trade agreements, infrastructure investments, and strategic policy alignment to support market accessibility and global commerce.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Enhance North-South, South-South and triangular regional and international cooperation on and access to science, technology and innovation and enhance knowledge sharing on mutually agreed terms, including through improved coordination among existing mechanisms, in particular at the United Nations level, and through a global technology facilitation mechanism
17.6.1 - Fixed broadband subscriptions per 100 inhabitants, by speed.
Relevance: Knowledge sharing is a fundamental pillar of global scientific progress, enabling researchers to build upon existing discoveries and innovate in addressing complex global challenges. Sustainable Development Goal 17.6 emphasises the need to strengthen international cooperation in science, technology, and innovation, fostering open access to research, cross-border academic collaboration, and equitable knowledge exchange between developed and developing countries. Through enhanced global research partnerships, countries can collectively advance scientific breakthroughs, improve policy decision-making, and drive sustainable development across multiple sectors.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Global Research Collaboration for Infectious Disease Preparedness (GloPID-R) unites funders and researchers worldwide to accelerate responses to infectious disease outbreaks. The European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) enables researchers across Europe to access and share scientific data, enhancing research transparency and efficiency. The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) promotes open science policies to support accessibility and inclusivity in research collaborations. The African Academy of Sciences (AAS) fosters knowledge exchange by connecting African scientists with international research networks, strengthening local research capacity. These programs demonstrate how open access, scientific cooperation, and institutional support can advance global knowledge-sharing efforts.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa struggles with limited access to digital research infrastructure, hindering cross-border scientific exchanges. Latin America lacks strong institutional frameworks to facilitate collaborative research projects, restricting knowledge transfer between local and international academia. Southeast Asia experiences disparities in open-access publication policies, making research data less accessible for regional and global scientific communities. Central Asia has underdeveloped research funding mechanisms, limiting the ability of researchers to participate in international collaborations. Strengthening knowledge-sharing programs in these regions would enhance research opportunities and foster innovation for sustainable development.
Future challenges: Limited funding for international research partnerships restricts collaborative opportunities between high-income and low-income countries. Data accessibility barriers—such as restrictive intellectual property laws, closed-access journals, and language limitations—hamper equitable knowledge sharing. Disparities in research infrastructure prevent scientists from developing nations from fully engaging in global collaborations, exacerbating existing inequalities. Political tensions and national security concerns sometimes limit international cooperation, obstructing open access to critical research. Addressing these challenges requires inclusive policy frameworks, investment in research infrastructure, and institutional commitments to fostering cross-border collaboration.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Technology transfer is a critical driver of economic growth, innovation, and sustainable development. Sustainable Development Goal 17.6 highlights the need for developing nations to access and adopt advanced solutions that enhance infrastructure, improve public services, and drive progress in key sectors such as healthcare, agriculture, and energy. Facilitating the transfer of cutting-edge technologies from developed to developing countries can help bridge the digital divide, foster industrial modernisation, and empower communities with new opportunities for education, employment, and sustainable livelihoods.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The United Nations Technology Bank for Least Developed Countries enhances technological capacity by facilitating access to expertise, research, and digital solutions. The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) implements programs to expand broadband infrastructure, connecting remote communities with modern digital services. The African Development Bank’s (AfDB) High 5s initiative fosters technological innovation across key sectors, improving access to smart agriculture, clean energy, and digital financial services. The Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves promotes advanced cooking technologies to reduce household air pollution and environmental degradation. These initiatives demonstrate how strategic investments and international partnerships can accelerate technology adoption in underserved regions.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa struggles with limited internet connectivity and outdated infrastructure, hindering access to digital education and e-governance services. South Asia faces challenges in modernising healthcare technologies, restricting access to telemedicine and diagnostic innovations. Latin America has gaps in renewable energy technology adoption, slowing progress toward sustainable energy transitions. The Pacific Island nations lack the necessary infrastructure for climate adaptation technologies, limiting their capacity to address rising sea levels and environmental threats. Strengthening technology transfer mechanisms in these regions would accelerate sustainable development and improve quality of life.
Future challenges: Intellectual property restrictions often limit developing nations’ ability to access and adapt advanced technologies. High costs associated with purchasing, maintaining, and integrating new technologies create financial barriers for low-income economies. Insufficient technical expertise prevents local industries from fully benefiting from technology transfers, necessitating education and training programs. Geopolitical tensions and trade restrictions sometimes hinder cross-border technology collaborations. Addressing these challenges requires policy reforms, international cooperation, and investment in capacity-building programs that ensure equitable access to advanced solutions.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Expanding capacity-building programs in science and innovation is crucial for sustainable development, fostering technological progress and economic growth in developing regions. Sustainable Development Goal 17.6 highlights the importance of strengthening human capital through education, skills development, and institutional support. By investing in training programs, nations can equip individuals with the expertise necessary to drive innovation, solve global challenges, and compete in the knowledge-based economy. Effective capacity-building initiatives ensure equitable access to scientific education, bridge research disparities between countries, and enhance the ability of communities to develop and implement innovative solutions.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Global Partnership for Science and Technology (GPST) provides technical training and research collaboration opportunities to scientists in developing countries. The Next Einstein Initiative strengthens Africa’s research capacity by training scientists and mathematicians through advanced academic programs. The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) implements STEM education programs to promote science and technology learning worldwide. The European Commission’s Horizon Europe program supports research excellence through international partnerships, providing funding and educational resources to researchers. These programs showcase how structured training efforts can elevate scientific competencies, foster innovation, and contribute to sustainable development.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa experiences a shortage of research institutions and funding, limiting opportunities for advanced scientific training. South Asia faces gaps in STEM education accessibility, restricting young talent from entering fields of science and technology. Latin America struggles with underdeveloped innovation ecosystems, slowing scientific breakthroughs and technological advancement. Small island developing states (SIDS) encounter challenges in scientific workforce development, preventing effective responses to climate and sustainability issues. Expanding training programs in these regions would unlock untapped potential, creating more inclusive knowledge economies and fostering global innovation.
Future challenges: Funding shortages impede the development of comprehensive training initiatives, restricting educational opportunities in low-income regions. Gaps in digital infrastructure prevent access to online learning and research collaboration for students and scientists in underserved areas. Brain drain, where trained professionals migrate to wealthier nations, undermines local research capacity and technological progress. Limited gender inclusivity in STEM fields reduces the diversity of perspectives in scientific advancements. Addressing these challenges requires targeted investment, policy reforms, and international partnerships to create sustainable pathways for capacity-building.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Promote the development, transfer, dissemination and diffusion of environmentally sound technologies to developing countries on favourable terms, including on concessional and preferential terms, as mutually agreed
17.7.1 - Total amount of funding for developing countries to promote the development, transfer, dissemination and diffusion of environmentally sound technologies.
Relevance: Encouraging eco-friendly technological advancements is fundamental to achieving sustainability and addressing global environmental challenges. Sustainable Development Goal 17.7 focuses on fostering green innovation, enabling nations to develop technologies that minimise ecological footprints while promoting economic growth. By advancing clean energy solutions, circular economy models, and sustainable industrial practices, countries can reduce carbon emissions, conserve natural resources, and drive long-term environmental resilience. Strengthening global cooperation on sustainable technology development ensures equitable access to transformative innovations that benefit all communities, particularly those most vulnerable to climate change.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) facilitates global research and development on renewable energy technologies, accelerating the transition to clean power sources. The Ellen MacArthur Foundation promotes circular economy innovations, helping industries reduce waste and maximise resource efficiency. The Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI) supports low-carbon development strategies, enabling governments to integrate sustainability into economic planning. The Clean Energy Ministerial fosters international collaboration on energy efficiency and clean power innovation. These programs demonstrate the power of technology-driven sustainability in achieving climate goals and improving global environmental stewardship.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa struggles with limited infrastructure for clean energy deployment, delaying progress toward carbon-neutral development. South Asia encounters challenges in scaling green manufacturing processes, hampering industrial sustainability. Latin America has untapped potential in circular economy solutions, restricting opportunities for waste reduction and resource efficiency. Small island developing states (SIDS) require urgent investment in climate adaptation technologies to mitigate rising sea levels and extreme weather events. Expanding sustainable technology initiatives in these regions would enhance environmental resilience and drive economic transformation.
Future challenges: High costs associated with research, development, and implementation of green technologies hinder widespread adoption. Intellectual property restrictions limit the accessibility of sustainable innovations for developing nations. Insufficient policy support for green technology investment slows progress in transitioning to low-carbon economies. Consumer and industry resistance to adopting sustainable alternatives creates market entry barriers for eco-friendly solutions. Addressing these obstacles requires global cooperation, financial incentives, and policy frameworks that foster the rapid deployment of sustainable technologies.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Strengthening access to renewable energy technologies is crucial for reducing global dependence on fossil fuels, mitigating climate change, and fostering economic resilience. Sustainable Development Goal17.7 emphasises the need for international collaboration to advance green energy solutions, ensuring that all communities, particularly those in developing nations, can benefit from clean and sustainable energy sources. By scaling up investment in solar, wind, hydro, and bioenergy technologies, nations can accelerate the transition toward carbon-neutral economies while improving energy security and accessibility for underserved populations.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The International Solar Alliance (ISA) promotes global cooperation on solar energy deployment, supporting developing nations in harnessing solar power for electricity generation. The Clean Energy Transition Partnership mobilises investments in wind and hydropower infrastructure to facilitate the shift away from fossil fuels. The Africa Renewable Energy Initiative (AREI) accelerates sustainable energy access by financing large-scale renewable projects across the continent. The Renewable Energy for Latin America and the Caribbean (RELAC) program strengthens the adoption of clean energy solutions through policy coordination and technical assistance. These initiatives illustrate how financial investment, technological innovation, and policy support can drive widespread renewable energy adoption.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa struggles with limited electrification and grid infrastructure, restricting the expansion of solar and wind energy projects. South Asia faces high dependence on coal, hindering the transition to clean energy alternatives. Latin America has abundant renewable resources but lacks sufficient investment in large-scale energy infrastructure. Small island developing states (SIDS) urgently need climate-resilient renewable energy solutions to reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels and strengthen disaster preparedness. Expanding access to renewable technologies in these regions would accelerate energy transitions and enhance sustainability.
Future challenges: High upfront costs associated with installing and maintaining clean energy infrastructure create financial barriers for developing nations. Limited technological expertise in emerging economies slows the adoption and implementation of advanced green solutions. Regulatory hurdles, including inconsistent policies and subsidies favouring fossil fuels, hinder progress toward renewable energy expansion. Intermittency issues in renewable energy generation require investment in storage solutions to ensure reliability and efficiency. Overcoming these challenges requires coordinated policy efforts, international funding support, and technological advancements that make green energy accessible to all.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Global challenges such as climate change, poverty, and inequality require coordinated efforts beyond national borders. Sustainable Development Goal 17.7 emphasises the necessity of fostering international partnerships to accelerate progress toward sustainable development. By promoting collaboration between governments, private sectors, civil society, and research institutions, nations can exchange expertise, mobilise resources, and implement policies that drive inclusive growth. Strengthening international cooperation ensures that best practices, innovative solutions, and financial investments are shared effectively, enabling all countries—especially developing nations—to achieve their sustainability targets.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Paris Agreement facilitates international cooperation in addressing climate change through shared commitments to reducing carbon emissions. The Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation supports multi-stakeholder collaboration to enhance development aid effectiveness. The United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) connects academics, policymakers, and businesses to implement evidence-based solutions for global sustainability goals. The Belt and Road Initiative Green Development Framework promotes environmental sustainability in infrastructure projects across multiple regions. These initiatives demonstrate how global partnerships contribute to advancing sustainable policies, financial investments, and knowledge exchange.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa encounters difficulties in accessing global funding for infrastructure and environmental sustainability projects. Southeast Asia requires stronger regional cooperation to address deforestation and marine pollution issues. Latin America struggles with institutional barriers that limit cross-border collaboration on renewable energy and climate adaptation. Small island developing states (SIDS) lack adequate international support for climate resilience, despite facing severe risks from rising sea levels and extreme weather events. Strengthening global partnerships in these regions would enhance sustainability efforts and improve economic stability.
Future challenges: Unequal access to financial resources limits the ability of developing nations to engage in high-impact sustainability initiatives. Political tensions and protectionist policies hinder cross-border cooperation, restricting the exchange of sustainable technologies and expertise. Complex regulatory environments create bureaucratic barriers that slow international investment in sustainability projects. Insufficient institutional frameworks in many countries prevent effective implementation and monitoring of collaborative sustainability efforts. Addressing these challenges requires enhanced diplomatic engagement, financial commitment, and governance structures that facilitate international cooperation.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Fully operationalise the technology bank and science, technology and innovation capacity-building mechanism for least developed countries by 2017 and enhance the use of enabling technology, in particular information and communications technology
Relevance: Universal internet access is fundamental to economic growth, education, healthcare, and social inclusion. Sustainable Development Goal 17.8 emphasises the need to expand digital connectivity, ensuring that all communities—especially in developing regions—can benefit from affordable and reliable internet services. By improving broadband infrastructure, lowering data costs, and supporting digital literacy programs, nations can bridge the digital divide, empower marginalised populations, and unlock opportunities for innovation and sustainable development. Strengthening international cooperation on internet accessibility ensures equitable digital participation, fostering inclusivity and resilience in an increasingly interconnected world.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Alliance for Affordable Internet (A4AI) works to reduce broadband costs and expand internet affordability in low-income countries. The Internet for All initiative by the World Economic Forum promotes partnerships that enhance digital connectivity for underserved communities. The African Union’s Digital Transformation Strategy aims to strengthen broadband infrastructure across Africa, accelerating socio-economic progress through digital inclusion. Google’s Project Loon deploys high-altitude balloons to provide internet connectivity in remote and disaster-affected areas. These programs demonstrate how innovative solutions, policy reforms, and investment can drive accessible and affordable internet expansion worldwide.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa faces high costs and weak infrastructure, limiting broadband penetration. South Asia struggles with disparities in urban and rural internet accessibility, creating digital inequality. Latin America encounters regulatory challenges that slow investment in fibre-optic networks. Small island developing states (SIDS) have geographic barriers to internet expansion, restricting access to modern digital services. Strengthening universal internet access in these regions would enhance economic development, improve education and healthcare delivery, and foster greater global participation in digital innovation.
Future challenges: High infrastructure costs hinder broadband expansion in low-income regions. Unequal distribution of digital access exacerbates socio-economic disparities, preventing equitable participation in online education, employment, and essential services. Limited policy frameworks restrict private-sector investments in affordable internet solutions. Cybersecurity risks and data privacy concerns create challenges in ensuring safe and secure digital connectivity. Overcoming these issues requires global collaboration, investment in digital infrastructure, and comprehensive policies that promote inclusive internet access for all.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Digital literacy is essential for navigating modern economies, accessing educational resources, and ensuring participation in the digital world. Sustainable Development Goal 17.8 emphasises the need to strengthen education on technology use, equipping individuals with the skills necessary to engage with digital tools, safeguard online security, and leverage technology for personal and professional development. By expanding digital literacy programs, nations can bridge knowledge gaps, empower marginalised communities, and foster inclusive economic growth driven by technological advancements.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Global Digital Literacy Network promotes education programs that enhance technological skills for students and professionals. The International Telecommunication Union’s (ITU) Digital Skills Academy provides training resources for developing digital competencies, particularly in underserved regions. The African Girls Can Code Initiative (AGCCI) equips young women with coding and digital skills, fostering gender equality in technology fields. The European Commission’s Digital Education Action Plan strengthens digital competencies across Europe by integrating technology training into education systems. These programs demonstrate how structured digital education efforts can improve workforce readiness, digital inclusion, and overall technological empowerment.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa faces challenges in integrating digital literacy into formal education, limiting digital skill development among students. South Asia struggles with disparities in access to digital learning tools, creating barriers for rural populations. Latin America experiences gaps in cybersecurity awareness and online safety education, increasing risks associated with digital participation. Small island developing states (SIDS) have limited opportunities for advanced digital training due to geographic isolation and infrastructure shortages. Strengthening digital literacy initiatives in these regions would enhance economic opportunities, improve cybersecurity resilience, and foster greater global participation in technological advancements.
Future challenges: Limited access to internet infrastructure prevents digital education from reaching remote communities. Unequal distribution of technological devices restricts digital learning opportunities, particularly in low-income areas. Insufficient policy support hinders the integration of digital literacy curricula into national education systems. Cybersecurity threats and misinformation challenges make digital literacy training increasingly essential yet difficult to implement effectively. Addressing these issues requires targeted investment, policy reform, and international cooperation to ensure digital skills education reaches all populations equitably.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Information and Communication Technology (ICT) infrastructure is a cornerstone of modern economic growth, social connectivity, and access to essential services. Sustainable Development Goal 17.8 emphasises the need to improve digital networks in underserved areas, ensuring that all communities—especially those in developing regions—can benefit from reliable and affordable internet access. Strengthening ICT infrastructure supports education, healthcare, commerce, and governance, helping nations bridge the digital divide and foster inclusive growth. By expanding broadband networks, investing in fibre-optic infrastructure, and deploying satellite-based solutions, countries can accelerate digital inclusion and empower communities with technological opportunities.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The African Union’s Digital Transformation Strategy enhances internet accessibility by expanding broadband networks across the continent. The ITU’s Global Connectivity Initiative supports digital infrastructure development in remote regions, strengthening digital inclusion efforts worldwide. Google’s Equiano subsea cable improves high-speed internet availability across Africa, fostering economic opportunities and innovation. The OneWeb satellite program deploys low-earth orbit satellites to expand internet connectivity in rural and hard-to-reach locations. These initiatives demonstrate how strategic investment, international collaboration, and technological innovation can drive equitable digital access.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa faces challenges in expanding broadband networks due to high costs and limited investment in fibre-optic infrastructure. South Asia struggles with disparities in urban and rural internet accessibility, slowing economic growth in remote areas. Latin America encounters regulatory hurdles that impede digital infrastructure expansion, restricting connectivity improvements. Small island developing states (SIDS) require urgent investment in satellite-based internet solutions to overcome geographic barriers and strengthen digital inclusion. Expanding ICT infrastructure development in these regions would accelerate digital transformation and enhance socio-economic opportunities.
Future challenges: High costs associated with installing and maintaining broadband infrastructure create financial barriers for developing nations. Weak regulatory frameworks and inconsistent policies discourage private-sector investments in ICT infrastructure. Geographical challenges in remote areas make network expansion difficult, requiring innovative solutions such as satellite-based connectivity and wireless broadband systems. Cybersecurity risks and data privacy concerns must be addressed to ensure the safe and secure expansion of digital networks. Overcoming these challenges requires international cooperation, financial support, and targeted policy frameworks that enable sustainable ICT infrastructure growth.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Enhance international support for implementing effective and targeted capacity-building in developing countries to support national plans to implement all the Sustainable Development Goals, including through North-South, South-South and triangular cooperation
17.9.1 - Dollar value of financial and technical assistance (including through North-South, South‑South and triangular cooperation) committed to developing countries.
Relevance: Technical assistance plays a crucial role in ensuring the successful execution of policies designed to address economic, environmental, and social challenges. Sustainable Development Goal 17.9 emphasises the need for capacity-building and expertise-sharing to support nations, particularly developing countries, in implementing effective governance strategies. By providing technical guidance, data analysis, and institutional support, international organisations and governments can help nations design evidence-based policies, optimise resource allocation, and enhance administrative efficiency. Strengthening technical assistance ensures that policy frameworks are not only well-developed but also successfully executed to achieve meaningful and lasting progress.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) delivers policy advisory services to governments worldwide, supporting sustainable development planning. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) offers technical expertise in financial and economic policy, helping nations strengthen fiscal management. The World Bank’s Governance Global Practice assists countries in designing and implementing public-sector reforms to improve efficiency and accountability. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) provides technical guidance on agricultural policies, enhancing food security strategies globally. These initiatives demonstrate the importance of expert-driven policy support in building stronger and more effective governance structures.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa struggles with gaps in governance capacity, limiting effective execution of development policies. South Asia experiences difficulties in fiscal policy management, impeding sustainable economic growth. Latin America faces regulatory inefficiencies that slow down reforms aimed at social and environmental sustainability. Small island developing states (SIDS) require specialised technical support to enhance climate resilience policies, given their heightened vulnerability to environmental changes. Strengthening technical assistance in these regions would improve policy effectiveness and accelerate progress toward sustainable development goals.
Future challenges: Limited financial resources restrict governments from accessing expert advisory services needed for effective policy formulation. Political instability in some nations undermines the continuity of technical assistance programs, disrupting policy implementation efforts. Inadequate data systems hinder evidence-based decision-making, reducing the effectiveness of policy interventions. Bureaucratic inefficiencies slow down the adoption of expert-driven recommendations, delaying governance improvements. Addressing these challenges requires sustained international cooperation, investment in knowledge-sharing platforms, and the development of adaptable technical assistance strategies tailored to national contexts.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Strong governance structures are essential for ensuring stability, economic growth, and effective policy implementation in developing nations. Sustainable Development Goal 17.9 emphasises the need to improve institutional capacity, enhance transparency, and promote accountable governance. By strengthening public institutions, governments can deliver better services, foster economic resilience, and reduce corruption, creating an environment where sustainable development thrives. Institutional strengthening is particularly critical for nations facing governance inefficiencies, weak legal frameworks, and limited administrative capabilities, as robust institutions play a key role in driving long-term development and social stability.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The World Bank’s Governance Global Practice supports capacity-building efforts by improving public sector efficiency and accountability. The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) implements transparency initiatives to enhance governance effectiveness and reduce corruption. The Open Government Partnership fosters collaboration between governments and civil society to promote open data and participatory decision-making. The African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) enables African nations to assess governance performance and implement institutional reforms. These programs demonstrate how targeted investments and international collaboration can improve governance structures and ensure effective institutional management.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa faces persistent governance inefficiencies and weak legal frameworks, slowing development efforts. South Asia struggles with bureaucratic inefficiencies and lack of transparency, undermining effective policy implementation. Latin America encounters obstacles related to corruption and weak enforcement of accountability measures, limiting government effectiveness. Small island developing states (SIDS) require stronger institutional frameworks to manage climate resilience, economic diversification, and policy coordination. Strengthening governance structures in these regions would enhance institutional effectiveness, promote stability, and accelerate sustainable development.
Future challenges: Corruption and lack of accountability hinder efforts to create transparent and responsive institutions. Insufficient funding and resources limit capacity-building programs, preventing effective governance reforms. Political instability disrupts institutional development, making long-term planning difficult. Weak judicial systems and inconsistent legal frameworks create enforcement challenges that reduce institutional credibility. Addressing these challenges requires international cooperation, financial support, and targeted policy frameworks that prioritise governance strengthening and institutional efficiency.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Expanding education and training opportunities is vital for fostering economic resilience, social development, and environmental sustainability. Sustainable Development Goal 17.9 highlights the need to strengthen learning systems, ensuring individuals, particularly in developing regions, acquire the knowledge and skills necessary to drive sustainable growth. Investing in education and vocational training empowers communities, enhances workforce capabilities, and promotes innovation, enabling nations to build inclusive economies that prioritise sustainability. By improving access to education, integrating sustainability-focused curricula, and expanding lifelong learning initiatives, countries can accelerate progress toward global development goals.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Global Partnership for Education (GPE) supports educational systems in developing nations, improving access to quality schooling. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) promotes lifelong learning programs that enhance skills development for sustainability-focused careers. The Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) initiative strengthens workforce training, ensuring individuals have the expertise needed for green industries and sustainable economic sectors. The Climate Education Coalition integrates climate literacy into formal education, fostering environmental awareness and responsible decision-making. These programs illustrate the transformative impact of expanding education and training opportunities in driving global sustainability efforts.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa faces significant barriers in access to formal education, limiting workforce preparedness for sustainability-focused industries. South Asia struggles with gender disparities in educational opportunities, restricting women’s participation in technical and vocational training. Latin America experiences gaps in sustainability-focused curricula, reducing awareness and innovation in environmental protection and resource management. Small island developing states (SIDS) encounter difficulties in integrating climate education into national schooling systems, despite facing acute environmental challenges. Strengthening educational initiatives in these regions would unlock potential for sustainable innovation, improve economic resilience, and enhance environmental stewardship.
Future challenges: Limited investment in education infrastructure restricts access to learning opportunities, particularly in low-income regions. Technological disparities hinder the integration of digital learning platforms, slowing progress in modernising education systems. Inadequate policy support for sustainability-focused curricula reduces awareness of environmental and social responsibility among students. Workforce training gaps prevent individuals from acquiring necessary skills for employment in sustainable industries. Addressing these challenges requires targeted funding, policy reforms, and international collaboration to ensure equitable access to education and vocational training.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Promote a universal, rules-based, open, non-discriminatory and equitable multilateral trading system under the World Trade Organization, including through the conclusion of negotiations under its Doha Development Agenda
Relevance: Equitable trade agreements play a vital role in fostering sustainable economic growth, reducing inequalities, and ensuring fair market access for all nations. Sustainable Development Goal 17.10 emphasises the need to reform trade policies, creating a more inclusive global trading system that benefits both developing and developed economies. By addressing tariff barriers, strengthening fair-trade mechanisms, and promoting transparent trade policies, nations can enhance economic resilience, boost international investment, and ensure sustainable development through equitable market participation. Strengthening global trade cooperation ensures that smaller economies and marginalised communities are not left behind in economic progress.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The World Trade Organization (WTO) facilitates negotiations on fair trade practices, reducing trade restrictions and promoting open markets. The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) enhances regional economic integration by eliminating tariffs and fostering cross-border trade within Africa. The European Union’s Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) grants developing countries preferential trade benefits, allowing them to compete more effectively in international markets. The Fair Trade Certification program promotes ethical trade practices by ensuring fair wages and sustainable production conditions for farmers and artisans worldwide. These initiatives highlight the impact of fair-trade policies, economic partnerships, and inclusive trade agreements on global development.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa struggles with restrictive export policies and high trade costs, limiting participation in global markets. South Asia faces barriers in tariff negotiations and non-tariff measures, restricting fair competition for local industries. Latin America experiences difficulties in integrating sustainable trade practices, hampering access to ethical trade certifications and environmental trade policies. Small island developing states (SIDS) encounter geographic and economic challenges that increase their vulnerability to trade disparities, limiting opportunities for international commerce. Expanding trade policy reform initiatives in these regions would improve market inclusivity, reduce economic inequalities, and enhance international trade fairness.
Future challenges: Protectionist policies and trade restrictions in major economies create barriers for developing nations, preventing fair access to global markets. Complex tariff structures and regulatory hurdles slow down progress toward transparent and inclusive trade agreements. Limited negotiation power among smaller economies makes it difficult for them to advocate for fair trade practices in international trade discussions. Unfair labor practices and environmental degradation linked to trade policies hinder ethical market participation. Addressing these challenges requires comprehensive policy reform, strengthened diplomatic cooperation, and financial investments that support sustainable trade development.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Market integration plays a crucial role in fostering economic development, enabling nations to participate in global commerce and benefit from international trade opportunities. Sustainable Development Goal 17.10 emphasises the need to strengthen the participation of developing countries in global markets, reducing trade barriers and enhancing economic inclusivity. By improving infrastructure, facilitating trade partnerships, and promoting policies that support fair competition, nations can create an equitable global trading system that allows developing economies to thrive. Market integration ensures that emerging industries, small enterprises, and marginalised communities can access international markets and contribute to sustainable economic progress.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) promotes regional economic collaboration by reducing trade restrictions and improving cross-border commerce within Africa. The World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) Trade Facilitation Agreement enhances supply chain efficiency and streamlines customs procedures for developing economies. The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) provides financial support for trade-related infrastructure projects that strengthen market access in Asia. The European Union’s Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) offer preferential trade conditions to developing nations, enhancing their ability to compete in global markets. These programs highlight the transformative impact of trade partnerships, financial investment, and policy coordination in fostering economic inclusivity.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa struggles with insufficient infrastructure, limiting its ability to compete in international trade. South Asia encounters high tariff barriers and restrictive trade policies that reduce export opportunities. Latin America faces difficulties in diversifying trade agreements, restricting access to new markets and investment opportunities. Small island developing states (SIDS) require stronger trade partnerships to overcome logistical challenges and boost export competitiveness. Strengthening market integration efforts in these regions would enhance economic inclusivity, increase international investments, and drive sustainable trade growth.
Future challenges: Trade protectionism in major economies creates barriers that limit fair access for emerging markets. Inadequate infrastructure for logistics and transportation restricts the ability of developing nations to efficiently export goods. Limited financial resources prevent small enterprises from expanding their operations into international markets. Complex trade regulations and bureaucratic hurdles slow down negotiations and policy implementation for market integration. Addressing these challenges requires coordinated policy reforms, financial investments in trade infrastructure, and international cooperation to ensure a fair and balanced global trading system.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Economic diversification is essential for reducing dependence on traditional sectors, fostering resilience, and enabling long-term sustainable development. Sustainable Development Goal 17.10 highlights the need to expand industrial opportunities beyond primary resource extraction and conventional economic models, ensuring that nations—especially developing economies—can build diverse and adaptable markets. By investing in technology-driven industries, creative sectors, and green innovation, governments can strengthen economic stability, enhance employment opportunities, and drive inclusive growth. A diversified economy allows nations to better withstand global economic fluctuations and shifts in market demands while promoting sustainability-focused industries that contribute to long-term prosperity.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries have implemented strategic plans to shift from oil dependency to technology, renewable energy, and tourism-driven economies. The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) encourages regional economic integration, fostering opportunities in industries such as digital services, manufacturing, and creative arts. The European Union’s Horizon Europe program supports research and innovation investments in green technologies, artificial intelligence, and advanced industrial solutions. Singapore’s Smart Nation initiative has transformed the country into a global hub for technology, entrepreneurship, and digital financial services. These programs showcase the potential of strategic investments, policy incentives, and regional collaboration in driving economic diversification.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa relies heavily on extractive industries, with limited expansion into value-added manufacturing and digital services. South Asia faces challenges in shifting from agriculture-based economies to high-tech and service-driven industries. Latin America experiences difficulties in developing sustainability-focused sectors, such as renewable energy and circular economy solutions. Small island developing states (SIDS) struggle with economic vulnerabilities due to reliance on tourism and fisheries, requiring investments in technology, entrepreneurship, and climate-resilient industries. Strengthening diversification initiatives in these regions would create new economic opportunities and improve long-term resilience.
Future challenges: High initial investment costs in emerging industries limit opportunities for market expansion in low-income nations. Regulatory barriers and outdated policy frameworks slow the adoption of innovative technologies and economic models. Limited infrastructure for advanced industries, such as clean energy and digital services, restricts growth potential in developing economies. Workforce skill gaps prevent individuals from transitioning into high-tech and knowledge-driven industries. Addressing these challenges requires investment in human capital, policy reforms, and international cooperation to create a more diverse and inclusive economic landscape.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Significantly increase the exports of developing countries, in particular with a view to doubling the least developed countries’ share of global exports by 2020
17.11.1 - Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global exports.
Relevance: Trade facilitation plays a crucial role in economic development, directly impacting global commerce, market accessibility, and logistics efficiency. Sustainable Development Goal 17.11 emphasises the need to improve logistics and market access, particularly for developing economies, by reducing trade barriers, streamlining customs procedures, and enhancing infrastructure. By strengthening trade facilitation mechanisms, countries can boost international trade, stimulate economic growth, and enable small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to participate in global markets more effectively.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) promotes the simplification of customs procedures to reduce transaction costs for businesses. The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) focuses on improving intra-African trade by lowering tariffs and harmonising regulatory frameworks. The ASEAN Single Window (ASW) streamlines documentation and customs processes across Southeast Asia, reducing trade delays and improving cross-border transactions. The EU’s Trade Facilitation Strategy integrates digital customs procedures and infrastructure investments to enhance market access for European businesses. These initiatives highlight the role of governance, digital technology, and regional cooperation in creating more efficient trade systems.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), such as those in Central Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, struggle with high transport costs and limited trade infrastructure. Small island developing states (SIDS) in the Pacific and Caribbean face shipping inefficiencies and regulatory challenges that hinder global market access. Post-conflict economies, including Afghanistan and South Sudan, encounter instability and unreliable logistics networks that impede trade expansion. Strengthening trade facilitation in these regions through policy reforms, infrastructure investments, and digitalisation efforts can help unlock their economic potential.
Future challenges: Inefficient customs procedures increase costs and delays for businesses, particularly in developing countries. Poor infrastructure in some regions—such as inadequate roads, ports, and border facilities—limits the movement of goods and disrupts supply chains. Fragmented regulatory frameworks create trade barriers, complicating market access for SMEs. Political instability and trade disputes can hinder cross-border cooperation, reducing the effectiveness of trade facilitation programs. Overcoming these challenges requires sustained investment in infrastructure, strong international partnerships, and the adoption of digital trade solutions.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Small businesses are vital to economic development, driving job creation, innovation, and local prosperity. Sustainable Development Goal 17.11 highlights the need to strengthen opportunities for local enterprises, ensuring they have access to financial resources, market opportunities, and regulatory support. By fostering a business-friendly environment, countries can empower entrepreneurs, enhance economic resilience, and promote equitable growth. Supporting small businesses through policy reforms, investment incentives, and digital tools is essential to unlocking their full potential in the global economy.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The International Finance Corporation (IFC) provides financing and advisory services to SMEs, helping them expand and compete in global markets. The Small Business Administration (SBA) in the United States offers loan programs, mentorship, and government contract opportunities for entrepreneurs. The European Investment Fund (EIF) facilitates SME funding through venture capital and microfinance schemes. Africa’s Tony Elumelu Foundation supports emerging entrepreneurs with seed funding, training, and networking opportunities. These initiatives showcase the importance of financial accessibility, capacity building, and government intervention in strengthening local enterprises.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa struggles with limited access to credit and market linkages, restricting SME growth. Southeast Asia’s informal economy lacks structured support systems for small entrepreneurs to transition into formal business sectors. Latin America experiences bureaucratic hurdles and high taxation, discouraging startups from scaling operations. Conflict-affected areas, such as parts of the Middle East, face economic instability and weak institutional frameworks that hinder business expansion. Strengthening support for small businesses in these regions through policy improvements, investment in entrepreneurial education, and digital infrastructure can create lasting economic opportunities.
Future challenges: Limited access to financial resources prevents small businesses from scaling operations and competing with larger firms. Regulatory inefficiencies, including complex licensing requirements and excessive taxation, create barriers to entrepreneurial growth. Market constraints, such as restricted access to global trade networks and supply chain disruptions, hinder SME competitiveness. Technological disparities make it difficult for small enterprises to adopt digital tools that enhance business efficiency. Overcoming these challenges requires comprehensive policy intervention, public-private partnerships, and digital transformation strategies tailored to SME needs.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Global partnerships are essential for fostering economic development, promoting sustainable growth, and addressing global challenges. Sustainable Development Goal 17.11 highlights the need to enhance cooperation for economic growth by strengthening international collaboration, facilitating knowledge exchange, and improving financial and technical support for developing economies. By fostering inclusive partnerships between governments, businesses, and civil society, nations can accelerate innovation, improve trade, and create economic opportunities that benefit communities worldwide.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) fosters international trade and infrastructure investment, connecting countries across Asia, Africa, and Europe. The OECD’s Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation promotes policy alignment, financial support, and technical assistance to enhance sustainable development efforts. The African Union’s Agenda 2063 encourages regional integration and economic cooperation across the continent. The UN’s Financing for Development (FfD) initiative strengthens global financial mechanisms to support sustainable economic growth in developing nations. These programs demonstrate how global partnerships, strategic investments, and knowledge sharing can drive long-term economic resilience.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa struggles with limited international investment and connectivity to global supply chains, restricting economic opportunities. South Asia faces trade barriers and infrastructure deficits that hinder cross-border cooperation and financial integration. The Caribbean’s small economies experience difficulties in attracting large-scale investments, limiting economic diversification. Post-conflict and fragile states, including parts of the Middle East, suffer from instability that discourages international collaboration. Strengthening global partnerships in these regions through improved trade agreements, investment frameworks, and institutional capacity-building can unlock economic potential.
Future challenges: Unequal access to funding and investment opportunities disadvantages developing economies, reducing their ability to compete in global markets. Political tensions and trade disputes disrupt cooperation between nations, creating barriers to economic integration. Technological disparities limit knowledge exchange and access to digital economies, preventing global connectivity. Insufficient regulatory alignment complicates cross-border investments and trade agreements, slowing economic progress. Addressing these challenges requires coordinated efforts among governments, businesses, and international organisations to create inclusive, sustainable, and resilient partnerships.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Realise timely implementation of duty-free and quota-free market access on a lasting basis for all least developed countries, consistent with World Trade Organization decisions, including by ensuring that preferential rules of origin applicable to imports from least developed countries are transparent and simple, and contribute to facilitating market access
17.12.1 - Weighted average tariffs faced by developing countries, least developed countries and small island developing States.
Relevance: Ensuring fair access to international markets is essential for fostering economic inclusivity, reducing trade disparities, and supporting sustainable development. Sustainable Development Goal 17.12 focuses on improving trade equity measures to provide developing economies, small enterprises, and marginalised producers with equal opportunities in global commerce. By reducing tariff barriers, enhancing market transparency, and promoting inclusive trade policies, countries can create a more balanced global economic environment that supports fair competition and shared prosperity.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) fosters international trade and infrastructure investment, connecting countries across Asia, Africa, and Europe. The OECD’s Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation promotes policy alignment, financial support, and technical assistance to enhance sustainable development efforts. The African Union’s Agenda 2063 encourages regional integration and economic cooperation across the continent. The UN’s Financing for Development (FfD) initiative strengthens global financial mechanisms to support sustainable economic growth in developing nations. These programs demonstrate how global partnerships, strategic investments, and knowledge sharing can drive long-term economic resilience.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa faces high trade tariffs and restricted integration into global supply chains, limiting economic growth. Small island developing states (SIDS) experience trade vulnerabilities due to geographical isolation and logistical costs. Conflict-affected regions, including parts of the Middle East and Central Africa, face instability that prevents businesses from engaging in international trade. Latin America’s small enterprises often struggle with export barriers and tariff discrepancies that make competing globally difficult. Strengthening trade equity measures in these regions through targeted policy reforms and international support can improve market accessibility and economic resilience.
Future challenges: High tariffs and non-tariff barriers disproportionately affect developing economies, restricting their ability to compete in global markets. Complex regulatory frameworks and trade policies create entry obstacles for small businesses and marginalised producers. Political instability and trade disputes disrupt equitable trade agreements, disadvantaging vulnerable economies. Technological gaps prevent many countries from leveraging digital trade opportunities, widening the global economic divide. Addressing these challenges requires coordinated international efforts, trade policy reforms, and sustainable investment strategies.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Strengthening trade agreements that support developing nations is critical for promoting economic stability, fostering inclusive growth, and ensuring fair participation in global markets. Sustainable Development Goal 17.12 emphasises the need for better policy alignment to enhance trade accessibility, reduce economic disparities, and build resilient international trade frameworks. By refining trade policies, harmonising regulations, and fostering cooperation between nations, governments can create sustainable trade partnerships that drive long-term development for emerging economies.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) reduces tariffs for exports from developing countries, facilitating market access and economic expansion. The African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) allows eligible African nations to export goods to the U.S. duty-free, stimulating trade and industrial development. The Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) between the European Union and African, Caribbean, and Pacific (ACP) countries aim to foster trade growth through preferential market terms and regulatory cooperation. The ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) enhances trade integration across Southeast Asia, reducing barriers and strengthening regional commerce. These programs highlight the role of structured agreements and policy coordination in supporting developing economies.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa faces difficulties in fully integrating into global trade agreements due to infrastructure limitations and regulatory inconsistencies. South Asia encounters tariff imbalances and bureaucratic trade barriers, restricting export opportunities for smaller economies. Latin America’s fragmented trade policies create inefficiencies, preventing seamless market access across the region. Fragile states in conflict zones experience instability that disrupts economic agreements and limits trade potential. Strengthening policy alignment through targeted reforms and international cooperation can improve trade accessibility for these regions and foster sustainable growth.
Future challenges: Complex and outdated trade policies hinder the ability of developing nations to compete in international markets. Limited institutional capacity prevents effective enforcement of trade agreements, reducing their impact. Disparities in tariff structures disadvantage emerging economies, creating uneven trade opportunities. Political instability and global trade tensions disrupt agreements, making it harder for developing countries to negotiate favourable terms. Addressing these challenges requires coordinated policy frameworks, institutional strengthening, and diplomatic engagement to enhance trade inclusivity.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Economic empowerment is crucial for fostering inclusive growth, reducing poverty, and ensuring resilient economies. Sustainable Development Goal 17.12 highlights the importance of promoting sustainable commerce initiatives that enable businesses, communities, and individuals to participate equitably in global markets. By integrating ethical trade practices, environmental sustainability, and fair business policies, countries can create economic systems that support long-term prosperity while protecting social and ecological integrity.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Fair Trade movement ensures producers receive equitable compensation while promoting environmentally responsible practices. The United Nations Global Compact encourages businesses to adopt sustainable and ethical trade principles, fostering corporate responsibility worldwide. The B Corp certification provides recognition to companies meeting high social and environmental standards, incentivising ethical business models. The Green Economy Initiative supports transitioning industries to sustainable production, integrating circular economy concepts and reducing resource exploitation. These programs highlight the role of responsible commerce, market accessibility, and policy alignment in creating sustainable economies.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa faces challenges related to financial accessibility and market instability, limiting fair trade opportunities. Southeast Asia's manufacturing sector requires stronger sustainability frameworks to reduce environmental impact while maintaining economic competitiveness. Latin America’s agricultural industries need better support to transition to sustainable farming practices. Conflict-affected regions suffer from disrupted economic activities, requiring recovery strategies that incorporate responsible trade models. Strengthening sustainable commerce in these regions through improved regulatory policies, investment incentives, and educational programs can enhance economic empowerment.
Future challenges: Weak regulatory enforcement in some regions allows exploitative trade practices to persist, undermining fair commerce. Limited financial incentives discourage businesses from adopting sustainability-driven models. Market access disparities prevent marginalised producers and small enterprises from benefiting from sustainable trade opportunities. The lack of consumer awareness about ethical and responsible consumption slows the demand for sustainable goods and services. Overcoming these challenges requires coordinated action from policymakers, businesses, and global organisations to drive sustainability in commerce.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Enhance global macroeconomic stability, including through policy coordination and policy coherence
17.13.1 - Macroeconomic Dashboard.
Relevance: Robust economic governance is essential for ensuring financial system resilience, maintaining stability in global markets, and fostering sustainable economic growth. Sustainable Development Goal 17.13 emphasises the need to strengthen economic governance by improving regulatory frameworks, enhancing transparency, and fortifying institutions that oversee financial stability. By reinforcing financial policies and governance structures, nations can mitigate economic shocks, prevent crises, and promote long-term financial sustainability.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Financial Stability Board (FSB) establishes international regulatory standards to ensure stability and crisis prevention in financial markets. The Basel Accords set banking regulations that enhance risk management and capital adequacy in financial institutions. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) provides economic surveillance and financial assistance programs that guide nations in improving fiscal policies. The World Bank’s Governance Global Practice supports countries in strengthening institutions that regulate economic activities, enhancing transparency and accountability. These programs highlight the importance of structured governance, international cooperation, and institutional capacity in securing financial system resilience.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa faces challenges related to weak financial oversight, increasing vulnerability to economic instability. Latin America experiences fluctuating inflation rates and limited regulatory enforcement, affecting financial sector credibility. South Asia’s banking systems struggle with non-performing loans and limited access to credit, hampering economic resilience. Fragile states affected by conflict and political instability lack solid institutional frameworks to ensure financial governance. Strengthening economic governance in these regions through targeted reforms and international collaboration can improve financial system resilience and promote sustainable economic growth.
Future challenges: Weak institutional capacity in some economies results in ineffective financial regulations, increasing exposure to economic crises. Corruption and lack of transparency in governance structures undermine financial stability, discouraging investment. Global economic disruptions, such as inflation and supply chain breakdowns, challenge policymakers in maintaining financial resilience. Technological advancements create both opportunities and risks for financial systems, requiring updated regulatory measures to prevent cyber threats and fraudulent activities. Addressing these challenges demands coordinated policy interventions, international financial cooperation, and regulatory modernisation to ensure stable and sustainable financial governance.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Effective international financial cooperation is essential for ensuring global economic stability, fostering sustainable development, and addressing financial disparities between nations. Sustainable Development Goal 17.13 highlights the need to improve policy coordination among countries to facilitate better financial governance, enhance capital flows, and mitigate economic risks. By strengthening international collaboration through trade agreements, investment frameworks, and regulatory alignment, nations can create a more resilient and inclusive financial system that supports sustainable economic growth.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Bretton Woods Institutions, including the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank, provide financial assistance and policy guidance to countries facing economic challenges. The G20 Finance Ministers’ and Central Bank Governors’ Meetings foster global financial coordination, addressing fiscal and monetary policies that impact economic stability. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) promotes regulatory alignment to combat financial crimes and ensure cross-border transparency. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision establishes international banking standards to reduce financial instability and enhance risk management. These programs demonstrate the significance of policy coordination, regulatory frameworks, and financial support in strengthening international financial systems.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa struggles with limited access to international financial markets and investment opportunities, restricting economic growth. South Asia’s banking sectors experience regulatory inconsistencies that hinder foreign direct investment and financial coordination. Latin America faces high debt burdens and limited fiscal cooperation, affecting economic resilience. Fragile states and conflict-affected regions often lack institutional frameworks to engage in international financial partnerships. Strengthening financial cooperation in these regions through policy alignment, investment support, and capacity-building programs can improve financial inclusion and stability.
Future challenges: Inconsistent monetary policies between nations create barriers to effective coordination, leading to volatility in global financial markets. Limited transparency in cross-border financial transactions results in inefficiencies and regulatory conflicts. Rising economic nationalism and trade protectionism hinder collaborative financial frameworks, reducing international economic integration. Technological disparities between developed and emerging economies prevent equal participation in financial digitalisation initiatives. Addressing these challenges requires concerted global efforts, policy harmonisation, and strategic financial agreements to ensure long-term economic stability and inclusion.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Developing effective crisis response mechanisms is essential for maintaining economic stability during financial shocks, natural disasters, and geopolitical disruptions. Sustainable Development Goal17.13 underscores the need for comprehensive strategies that ensure economic resilience, protect vulnerable populations, and mitigate long-term financial consequences. By strengthening institutional frameworks, enhancing fiscal policy readiness, and fostering international cooperation, nations can safeguard their economies against unforeseen disruptions and promote sustainable recovery.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) Rapid Financing Instrument (RFI) provides emergency financial assistance to countries facing economic shocks, enabling quick stabilisation measures. The World Bank’s Catastrophe Deferred Drawdown Option (Cat-DDO) offers prearranged funding to nations affected by natural disasters, ensuring timely intervention. The European Stability Mechanism (ESM) supports eurozone countries in responding to financial crises through coordinated fiscal policies. The United Nations Humanitarian Response Fund integrates economic aid into recovery strategies for conflict-affected regions, facilitating economic rebuilding efforts. These programs highlight the role of proactive planning, financial preparedness, and coordinated policy action in addressing economic instability.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa experiences difficulties in accessing emergency financial aid, limiting rapid economic stabilisation during crises. South Asia’s densely populated economies require more robust disaster response measures to mitigate economic disruptions caused by climate-related events. Latin America struggles with debt vulnerabilities and inconsistent fiscal policies that exacerbate economic downturns. Fragile and conflict-affected states lack financial infrastructure to recover from crises efficiently. Strengthening crisis response mechanisms in these regions through policy coordination, economic contingency planning, and international assistance can improve financial stability and resilience.
Future challenges: Limited emergency financial resources hinder countries from deploying swift stabilisation strategies during economic downturns. Inadequate institutional coordination reduces the effectiveness of policy responses, leading to prolonged economic recovery. Geopolitical tensions disrupt financial cooperation, affecting global crisis intervention efforts. Rapid technological changes create cybersecurity risks that threaten financial systems, requiring enhanced digital protection strategies. Overcoming these challenges demands integrated fiscal policies, international financial collaboration, and adaptive governance structures to ensure long-term economic resilience.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Enhance policy coherence for sustainable development
17.14.1 - Number of countries with mechanisms in place to enhance policy coherence of sustainable development.
Relevance: Integrated planning is essential for ensuring cohesion across various development sectors, fostering efficient resource allocation, and promoting sustainable progress. Sustainable Development Goal 17.14 emphasises the importance of aligning policies, strategies, and initiatives across economic, social, and environmental domains to maximise impact. By streamlining coordination among governments, industries, and civil society, countries can enhance development effectiveness, reduce inefficiencies, and create inclusive solutions that address global challenges.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The United Nations Development Programme’s (UNDP) Integrated National Financing Framework (INFF) helps countries coordinate financial strategies across multiple sectors, ensuring sustainable resource allocation. The European Green Deal establishes cross-sectoral policies that integrate environmental, economic, and social strategies to drive sustainability. The African Union’s Agenda 2063 prioritises development coordination across sectors, promoting long-term socioeconomic progress. The Sustainable Cities and Communities Program supports urban planning models that integrate infrastructure, housing, and environmental sustainability for holistic development. These programs demonstrate the importance of cross-sectoral collaboration, strategic policy integration, and coordinated investments for effective development.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa experiences difficulties in aligning economic growth with environmental sustainability, creating disparities in sectoral development. South Asia’s urban expansion lacks integrated infrastructure planning, leading to congestion and resource inefficiencies. Latin America’s social development programs often operate in isolation, reducing synergies between education, healthcare, and economic inclusion efforts. Conflict-affected regions lack stable governance frameworks to implement integrated policies effectively. Strengthening sectoral alignment in these regions through improved governance, stakeholder coordination, and cross-sector investment strategies can enhance sustainable development outcomes.
Future challenges: Policy fragmentation across ministries and agencies reduces coordination efficiency, leading to conflicting development priorities. Limited funding for cross-sector initiatives restricts the ability of governments to implement comprehensive strategies. Bureaucratic barriers complicate collaboration between the public and private sectors, slowing integrated policy execution. Data accessibility gaps hinder informed decision-making, preventing seamless coordination among development stakeholders. Addressing these challenges requires enhanced governance frameworks, transparent funding mechanisms, and evidence-based policymaking to ensure cross-sector alignment.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Strengthening coordination between industries is vital for fostering innovation, optimising resource utilisation, and driving sustainable economic growth. Sustainable Development Goal 17.14 emphasises the necessity of cross-sector collaboration to integrate expertise, share knowledge, and create synergistic solutions that benefit multiple industries. By enhancing partnerships between public and private sectors, technology firms, financial institutions, and environmental stakeholders, countries can accelerate development, improve efficiency, and address global challenges more effectively.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Circular Economy Initiative fosters partnerships between manufacturing, waste management, and energy sectors to create sustainable production cycles. The Smart Cities Program integrates urban planning, technology, and transportation industries to optimise infrastructure and service delivery. The United Nations Industrial Development Organisation’s (UNIDO) Public-Private Partnership models enable businesses and governments to jointly invest in industry-wide solutions. The EU Horizon Europe program strengthens collaboration between scientific research, technology innovation, and commercial enterprises to drive economic development. These initiatives highlight the importance of cross-sector coordination, knowledge exchange, and investment alignment to maximise efficiency and impact.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa faces challenges in aligning agricultural, financial, and technological sectors to improve food security and market access. South Asia requires stronger collaboration between energy providers, transportation networks, and city planning authorities to ensure sustainable urban development. Latin America’s environmental and industrial sectors need improved coordination to reduce ecological damage while maintaining economic productivity. Conflict-affected regions lack institutional frameworks for cross-sector cooperation, limiting opportunities for economic recovery. Strengthening coordination mechanisms in these regions through policy reforms, investment incentives, and institutional capacity-building can enhance industrial collaboration and efficiency.
Future challenges: Bureaucratic barriers complicate cooperation between industries, slowing the integration of new solutions. Limited communication and data-sharing frameworks reduce efficiency in industry-wide coordination efforts. Financial constraints hinder joint investments in large-scale projects that require multi-sector involvement. Technological disparities across sectors prevent equitable adoption of advanced innovations and digital transformation. Addressing these challenges requires strategic policy alignment, improved data-sharing infrastructure, and international collaboration to support integrated industrial initiatives.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Integrating environmental and social considerations into policy frameworks is essential for achieving sustainable development, reducing inequalities, and protecting ecosystems. Sustainable Development Goal 17.14 emphasises the need for policy alignment that ensures economic, environmental, and social objectives work together harmoniously. By embedding sustainability into legislative, corporate, and economic strategies, governments and industries can foster long-term resilience, promote responsible growth, and support inclusive prosperity.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The European Green Deal embeds environmental principles into economic growth strategies, prioritising climate neutrality and clean energy transitions. The United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights ensure that corporate policies align with social justice and ethical labor standards. The Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) frameworks adopted by businesses worldwide integrate responsible investment, carbon reduction, and social equity into corporate decision-making. The Paris Agreement sets international commitments to reduce carbon emissions while promoting economic policies that support climate resilience. These programs demonstrate how sustainability integration across policymaking can drive environmental protection, social equity, and economic stability.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa struggles with balancing economic growth with environmental conservation, leading to deforestation and resource depletion. South Asia’s rapid urbanisation often overlooks social equity and environmental safeguards, creating sustainability gaps in infrastructure development. Latin America faces difficulties in harmonising industrial expansion with biodiversity conservation, limiting policy coherence. Conflict-affected regions lack governance structures to enforce sustainable policies, resulting in ecological and social vulnerabilities. Strengthening sustainability integration in these regions through policy reforms, education initiatives, and financial incentives can ensure long-term responsible development.
Future challenges: Inconsistent regulations across sectors create policy fragmentation, limiting cohesive sustainability action. Limited investment in environmental and social initiatives slows progress in embedding sustainability principles into economic strategies. Political and corporate resistance to sustainability policies hinders implementation efforts, prioritising short-term financial gains over long-term resilience. Insufficient data transparency prevents policymakers from making evidence-based decisions that support sustainability objectives. Overcoming these challenges requires enhanced governance mechanisms, stakeholder engagement, and financial innovation to ensure comprehensive sustainability integration.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Respect each country’s policy space and leadership to establish and implement policies for poverty eradication and sustainable development
17.15.1 - Extent of use of country-owned results frameworks and planning tools by providers of development cooperation.
Relevance: Ensuring nations have autonomy in their development planning is essential for fostering sustainable growth, respecting sovereignty, and tailoring policies to local priorities. Sustainable Development Goal 17.15 highlights the need for country-led strategies that empower governments to define and implement their own development agendas without external interference. By strengthening national institutions, enhancing policy ownership, and fostering strategic international partnerships, countries can achieve resilient economic and social progress.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness prioritises national ownership of development strategies, reducing dependency on external interventions. The African Union’s Agenda 2063 provides a continent-wide blueprint for sustainable development while preserving individual country sovereignty in policy decisions. The United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF) aligns international support with national priorities, ensuring development planning reflects country-specific needs. The Sustainable Development Investment Partnership (SDIP) mobilises private and public resources in ways that complement national development strategies. These programs demonstrate the importance of aligning global cooperation with country-led policy planning.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa struggles with reliance on external aid, limiting independent policy formulation and long-term economic stability. South Asia experiences difficulties in balancing international investment with national priorities, affecting sovereign decision-making. Latin America faces hurdles in strengthening institutional capacity, reducing efficiency in country-led strategy implementation. Conflict-affected nations often lack stable governance structures to drive autonomous development. Strengthening local policy frameworks, reducing dependency on external conditions, and fostering domestic investment mechanisms can improve development planning autonomy in these regions.
Future challenges: Heavy reliance on foreign aid and external financing reduces national control over development priorities. Limited institutional capacity weakens governance frameworks, affecting policy execution and long-term sustainability. Trade dependencies and global economic pressures restrict independent policy-making, influencing national strategies. Political instability and external interventions in some nations complicate autonomous development initiatives. Addressing these challenges requires strong governance structures, sustainable domestic economic models, and international respect for national sovereignty in development efforts.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Strengthening adaptability in governance frameworks is essential for ensuring responsive policymaking, fostering resilience in economic and social systems, and addressing emerging challenges effectively. Sustainable Development Goal 17.15 highlights the need for policy flexibility, enabling governments to adapt to evolving circumstances, integrate innovative solutions, and refine strategies in real time. By embedding dynamic policy mechanisms within governance structures, nations can promote sustainable development while maintaining stability in the face of uncertainty.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Agile Governance Framework introduced by the World Economic Forum promotes adaptive policymaking through stakeholder collaboration, regulatory innovation, and digital transformation. The European Union’s Horizon 2020 program supports flexible policy research, enabling governments to modify regulations in response to technological and environmental shifts. The Singapore Smart Nation Initiative embeds real-time data analytics into governance structures, allowing policy adjustments based on evolving social and economic trends. The UNDP’s Adaptive Social Protection Program ensures rapid policy shifts during crises, enabling governments to strengthen social safety nets dynamically. These initiatives underscore the importance of responsive governance, digital integration, and proactive policymaking.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa faces challenges in integrating real-time data-driven policy adjustments due to infrastructure gaps. South Asia experiences difficulties in modifying economic and social policies swiftly, often constrained by bureaucratic processes. Latin America’s governance structures require enhanced institutional flexibility to respond to economic fluctuations and social demands. Conflict-affected regions lack stable political mechanisms that enable policy evolution during recovery efforts. Strengthening adaptive governance in these regions through digital policymaking, institutional reforms, and stakeholder engagement can improve long-term development outcomes.
Future challenges: Bureaucratic inefficiencies prevent governments from swiftly adjusting regulations to respond to emerging challenges. Political resistance to governance reform slows adaptive policymaking, limiting agility in crisis response and economic transitions. Limited technological integration restricts real-time data utilisation for policy adjustments. Global economic uncertainties require governments to balance long-term planning with immediate policy adaptability. Overcoming these challenges demands institutional modernisation, strategic policy foresight, and multi-sector collaboration to ensure governance resilience.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Balancing international cooperation with national sovereignty is crucial for fostering sustainable development, ensuring fair global governance, and maintaining independent policy-making. Sustainable Development Goal 17.15 emphasises the need for international support that enhances development efforts while respecting the autonomy of nations. By strengthening diplomatic engagement, facilitating equitable financial assistance, and promoting mutually beneficial partnerships, countries can collaborate effectively without compromising sovereignty.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness promotes country-led development planning, ensuring international aid aligns with national priorities. The Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation fosters collaborative governance, allowing nations to maintain policy autonomy while benefiting from global expertise. The G77 coalition empowers developing countries to advocate for fair international economic policies without external interference. The Belt and Road Initiative promotes infrastructure development while allowing nations to tailor agreements to their specific needs. These programs highlight the importance of international assistance mechanisms that respect national policy frameworks and governance structures.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: Sub-Saharan Africa faces challenges related to aid dependency, limiting self-determined development strategies. South Asia experiences difficulties in negotiating fair trade agreements that align with national interests. Latin America encounters issues in maintaining policy autonomy amid international financial interventions. Conflict-affected regions often lack stable institutions to engage in equal global partnerships. Strengthening frameworks for respectful international cooperation in these regions through diplomatic negotiations, governance strengthening, and fair financial assistance mechanisms can enhance sovereignty while fostering development.
Future challenges: Conditional foreign aid may restrict national decision-making, influencing domestic policy agendas. Political interference in international partnerships can undermine sovereignty and reduce trust in diplomatic cooperation. Disparities in global economic influence create imbalances in decision-making, favouring larger economies over smaller nations. Limited institutional capacity in developing countries makes it difficult to negotiate fair and balanced international agreements. Addressing these challenges requires equitable diplomatic engagement, improved governance mechanisms, and transparent global financial systems.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Enhance the Global Partnership for Sustainable Development, complemented by multi-stakeholder partnerships that mobilise and share knowledge, expertise, technology and financial resources, to support the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals in all countries, in particular developing countries
17.16.1 - Number of countries reporting progress in multi-stakeholder development effectiveness monitoring frameworks that support the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals.
Relevance: Public-private collaboration plays a crucial role in achieving Sustainable Development Goal 17.16, which focuses on enhancing cooperation between governments and businesses to drive sustainable development. Strong partnerships between the public and private sectors facilitate resource mobilisation, innovation, and inclusive economic growth. Governments provide regulatory frameworks, infrastructure, and public services, while businesses contribute expertise, technology, and investment. By working together, these entities can address global challenges such as poverty alleviation, climate resilience, digital transformation, and social equity. Effective public-private partnerships strengthen governance, improve service delivery, and foster a sustainable economic ecosystem that benefits communities worldwide.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Global Partnership for Education (GPE) unites governments, businesses, and civil society to enhance education access in developing nations by mobilising funding and technological resources. The Sustainable Development Investment Partnership (SDIP) connects governments and private investors to accelerate financing for sustainable infrastructure projects, promoting economic resilience in emerging markets. The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (GAVI) combines public sector leadership with pharmaceutical industry expertise to ensure equitable access to life-saving vaccines. Meanwhile, initiatives such as the RE100 campaign, which unites multinational corporations in their commitment to renewable energy, illustrate how businesses can actively support climate action. These programs showcase how well-structured collaborations can amplify impact and drive sustainable progress.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: In sub-Saharan Africa, many countries struggle with regulatory barriers and limited institutional capacity, hindering businesses from engaging in sustainable development initiatives. In South Asia, public-private cooperation in digital infrastructure is underdeveloped, creating disparities in internet access and technological innovation. Latin America faces challenges in mobilising private sector funding for environmental sustainability projects due to political instability. Conflict-affected regions, such as parts of the Middle East and Central Africa, suffer from weak governance structures that deter businesses from engaging in long-term investments. Strengthening institutional frameworks and governance mechanisms in these regions would enable more effective public-private collaboration, unlocking sustainable development opportunities.
Future challenges: Regulatory uncertainties, inconsistent legal frameworks, and bureaucratic inefficiencies often discourage businesses from investing in sustainable development initiatives. Corruption and lack of transparency can weaken trust between governments and private entities, undermining collaborative efforts. Technological disparities and limited digital infrastructure prevent effective knowledge sharing and innovation. Financial constraints, particularly in low-income countries, hinder businesses from contributing to long-term sustainability projects. Overcoming these obstacles requires comprehensive policy reforms, capacity-building programs, and mechanisms that ensure accountability and trust in public-private partnerships.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Civil society engagement is a fundamental component of achieving Sustainable Development Goal 17.16, which emphasises strengthening the participation of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and local communities in sustainable development efforts. NGOs and community-based organisations play a pivotal role in advocating for social change, implementing grassroots initiatives, and bridging gaps between governments and citizens. They contribute expertise, mobilise resources, and ensure marginalised voices are represented in decision-making processes. Strengthening civil society engagement fosters inclusive governance, enhances policy effectiveness, and accelerates progress toward sustainable development goals by empowering local communities to take ownership of their future.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Open Government Partnership (OGP) fosters collaboration between governments and civil society to improve transparency, accountability, and participatory governance. The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria integrates civil society organisations into healthcare initiatives to ensure equitable access to medical resources. The Community-Led Conservation Program promotes local engagement in environmental protection, enabling indigenous communities to steward natural resources sustainably. The UN Voluntary National Reviews (VNRs) framework encourages civil society participation in monitoring SDG implementation, ensuring inclusive policymaking. These initiatives highlight how empowering civil society strengthens governance, enhances community resilience, and drives sustainable development outcomes.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: In sub-Saharan Africa, limited funding and government restrictions impede NGOs from effectively addressing social and environmental issues. In Central and South Asia, local community participation in governance remains weak due to bureaucratic hurdles and limited civil liberties. Latin America faces obstacles such as political instability and inconsistent legal frameworks that hinder civil society organisations from mobilising resources effectively. In conflict-affected regions, such as parts of the Middle East and Central Africa, insecurity and lack of institutional support prevent local communities from actively engaging in development efforts. Strengthening mechanisms for civil society participation in these regions would enable more inclusive and equitable sustainable development.
Future challenges: Legal and political constraints, such as restrictive NGO laws and shrinking civic space, limit organisations' ability to operate freely. Financial instability affects grassroots organisations, making it difficult to sustain long-term community-led initiatives. Limited digital access and technological infrastructure prevent civil society groups from effectively mobilising resources and sharing knowledge. Weak institutional frameworks in certain regions fail to recognise the importance of civic participation, leading to exclusion from policymaking processes. Overcoming these challenges requires stronger regulatory support, capacity-building programs, and institutional reforms to empower civil society organisations and local communities.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Expanding global development networks is a key aspect of Sustainable Development Goal 17.16, which focuses on strengthening partnerships for sustainability. Global networks unite governments, businesses, NGOs, and international organisations to accelerate sustainable development efforts across borders. By fostering collaboration, knowledge exchange, and resource mobilisation, these networks enable countries and industries to implement effective sustainability strategies, address climate change, enhance economic resilience, and promote social equity. Strengthening global partnerships encourages innovation, harmonises policy frameworks, and enhances the ability of nations to meet their sustainability commitments through shared expertise and coordinated action.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The United Nations Global Compact unites businesses worldwide to align corporate strategies with sustainability principles, fostering responsible business practices. The Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) connects research institutions, governments, and civil society organisations to advance science-based solutions for achieving the SDGs. The Partnership for Action on Green Economy (PAGE) assists nations in transitioning to sustainable economies by integrating environmental policies into economic planning. The Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI) provides technical assistance and policy recommendations for countries seeking sustainable economic development. These initiatives illustrate how global partnerships strengthen sustainability efforts by mobilising resources, exchanging best practices, and enhancing policy coherence.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: In sub-Saharan Africa, limited institutional capacity and financial constraints hinder cross-border sustainability initiatives. In South Asia, inconsistent regulatory frameworks create challenges for establishing international partnerships in environmental conservation and digital transformation. Latin America struggles with fragmented collaboration between governments and industries, impeding efforts to integrate sustainable economic models. In conflict-affected regions, such as parts of the Middle East and Central Africa, political instability and weak governance prevent effective engagement in global sustainability networks. Strengthening connectivity between nations, fostering institutional cooperation, and addressing financial barriers can help expand global partnerships for sustainability in these regions.
Future challenges: Regulatory fragmentation across nations can obstruct international collaboration, delaying policy alignment on sustainability measures. Lack of financial commitment from key stakeholders weakens the effectiveness of cross-sector partnerships. Technological disparities limit access to digital platforms that facilitate global cooperation. Geopolitical tensions and national interests sometimes hinder multinational sustainability agreements, affecting collective progress. Addressing these challenges necessitates enhanced diplomatic efforts, long-term financial investment in sustainability programs, and greater institutional transparency to strengthen global development networks.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Encourage and promote effective public, public-private and civil society partnerships, building on the experience and resourcing strategies of partnerships
17.17.1 - Amount in United States dollars committed to public-private partnerships for infrastructure.
Relevance: Inclusive development models are central to achieving Sustainable Development Goal 17.17, which emphasises promoting shared responsibility in sustainability. These models ensure that all societal stakeholders—including governments, businesses, communities, and individuals—actively participate in shaping sustainable futures. By fostering inclusivity, development strategies can address economic inequality, promote equitable resource distribution, and encourage local participation in decision-making. Shared responsibility enhances environmental stewardship, strengthens social cohesion, and ensures that sustainability efforts are not confined to policymakers and corporations but extend to grassroots movements and everyday actions.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Circular Economy Initiative promotes resource efficiency by encouraging businesses, consumers, and policymakers to collaborate on waste reduction and material reuse. The Community-Led Renewable Energy Transition Program empowers local groups to invest in and manage sustainable energy projects, reducing dependence on centralised power structures. The Social Enterprise Development Fund supports grassroots businesses that prioritise sustainability, ensuring economic growth benefits underserved populations. The Global Network for Inclusive Green Finance connects financial institutions, governments, and NGOs to improve access to sustainable investment opportunities. These initiatives highlight how shared responsibility strengthens sustainable development efforts across sectors and communities.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: In sub-Saharan Africa, financial barriers prevent local communities from participating in sustainability-focused entrepreneurship. In South Asia, bureaucratic inefficiencies limit community-led sustainability projects, creating dependence on centralised governance structures. Latin America struggles with disparities in resource allocation, making it difficult for marginalised populations to engage in sustainable initiatives. In conflict-affected regions, weak institutional frameworks hinder the integration of inclusive sustainability models into economic recovery plans. Strengthening financial access, policy coherence, and governance structures in these regions would enhance shared responsibility for sustainability.
Future challenges: Economic inequalities limit marginalised communities' ability to contribute to sustainable development. Policy fragmentation prevents coherent implementation of participatory sustainability strategies. Corporate resistance to adopting socially inclusive models delays progress toward equitable resource distribution. Educational gaps weaken sustainability awareness among the general public, reducing engagement in responsible consumption and environmental protection. Overcoming these challenges demands strategic reforms, financial inclusivity, and targeted educational campaigns that emphasise the collective role of all societal sectors in sustainable development.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Strengthening financial cooperation is fundamental to achieving Sustainable Development Goal 17.17, which emphasises the need for enhanced funding and resource sharing to drive sustainable development. Financial cooperation ensures that governments, businesses, and international organisations pool resources efficiently to tackle global challenges, including poverty alleviation, climate resilience, and equitable economic growth. By fostering strong financial partnerships, countries can bridge funding gaps, optimise resource allocation, and implement long-term sustainability initiatives. Collaborative financial strategies enhance global economic stability, drive investment in underserved regions, and ensure that all nations, regardless of income levels, can achieve sustainable development goals.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Green Climate Fund (GCF) mobilises international funding to support climate adaptation and mitigation projects in developing nations. The International Development Association (IDA) provides concessional financing to low-income countries, enabling them to invest in critical infrastructure and social programs. The Global Infrastructure Facility (GIF) brings together public and private stakeholders to finance large-scale sustainable infrastructure projects. The Debt Sustainability Framework for Low-Income Countries, led by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), assists governments in managing debt and securing responsible financial agreements for development. These programs demonstrate how resource-sharing and financial collaboration empower nations to implement transformative development strategies.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: In sub-Saharan Africa, many countries face high debt burdens and limited access to concessional financing, hindering investment in social services and infrastructure. In South Asia, financial frameworks for sustainability projects remain fragmented, preventing efficient allocation of resources. Latin America experiences fluctuations in foreign investment due to economic instability, impeding long-term sustainable development plans. Conflict-affected regions, including parts of the Middle East and Central Africa, lack financial security and face challenges in securing international funding for rebuilding efforts. Strengthening financial cooperation in these regions requires strategic investment, debt relief initiatives, and policies that foster economic stability.
Future challenges: Debt dependency in low-income nations reduces financial autonomy and limits investment in sustainability. Economic inequality weakens financial partnerships, leading to disparities in funding access across regions. Fluctuating global investment trends hinder long-term financial planning for sustainability. Weak governance structures in some nations prevent efficient distribution of financial resources, limiting development impact. Addressing these challenges requires strategic policy reforms, international accountability mechanisms, and equitable financial agreements that prioritise long-term sustainability over short-term economic gains.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Expanding capacity-building initiatives is essential for achieving Sustainable Development Goal 17.17, which focuses on strengthening joint efforts for long-term impact. Capacity-building enhances the skills, knowledge, and institutional effectiveness of governments, businesses, civil society organisations, and local communities, enabling them to implement sustainable development strategies more efficiently. By fostering collaboration in education, workforce development, governance, and technological innovation, capacity-building initiatives drive inclusive growth, empower underserved populations, and create resilient societies capable of addressing global challenges such as climate change, economic inequality, and healthcare accessibility.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Capacity Development Initiative supports institutional strengthening by providing technical training, governance improvements, and policy advisory services. The Skills for Prosperity Program, led by the UK government, enhances workforce development by expanding vocational education and job training in emerging economies. The Global Capacity-Building Programme for Climate Adaptation, launched by the UNFCCC, equips nations with the expertise to implement climate resilience policies. The Digital Skills for Development Initiative, backed by international tech companies, helps communities bridge the digital divide and improve access to technological education. These programs highlight how capacity-building strengthens societies and accelerates sustainable development outcomes.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: In sub-Saharan Africa, limited access to quality education and technical training prevents workforce readiness for sustainable industries. In South Asia, gaps in governance capacity hinder policy implementation, slowing development progress. Latin America faces challenges in digital transformation and educational infrastructure, creating barriers to economic inclusion. Conflict-affected regions, including parts of the Middle East and Central Africa, struggle with disrupted institutions and weakened public services, limiting opportunities for long-term development initiatives. Strengthening capacity-building frameworks in these regions can unlock their potential for sustainable economic growth and social stability.
Future challenges: Funding limitations restrict governments and NGOs from scaling up training and institutional development programs. Educational disparities create unequal access to learning opportunities, limiting the ability of marginalised populations to participate in sustainable development efforts. Technological barriers prevent efficient knowledge exchange and digital skill development, particularly in remote or underserved areas. Weak institutional frameworks in certain countries reduce the effectiveness of governance training and policy implementation. Addressing these challenges requires strategic investment, cross-sector collaboration, and innovative learning models that ensure inclusive and sustainable capacity-building programs.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
By 2020, enhance capacity-building support to developing countries, including for least developed countries and small island developing States, to increase significantly the availability of high-quality, timely and reliable data disaggregated by income, gender, age, race, ethnicity, migratory status, disability, geographic location and other characteristics relevant in national contexts
17.18.1 - Statistical capacity indicators.
17.18.2 - Number of countries that have national statistical legislation that complies with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics.
17.18.3 - Number of countries with a national statistical plan that is fully funded and under implementation, by source of funding.
No data available
Relevance: Strengthening data-driven decision-making is essential for achieving Sustainable Development Goal 17.18, which focuses on enhancing evidence-based policy development. Reliable, high-quality data enables governments, businesses, and international organisations to formulate policies that effectively address economic, social, and environmental challenges. When policymakers have access to accurate and timely data, they can design interventions that are measurable, efficient, and responsive to dynamic global issues. By fostering data transparency, investing in technological advancements, and promoting statistical capacity-building, nations can improve governance, optimise resource allocation, and ensure policy decisions lead to tangible, long-term sustainability outcomes.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Global Data Partnership collaborates with governments and organisations to improve data accessibility, ensuring informed policy development. The World Bank’s Open Data Initiative enhances transparency by making economic and social indicators publicly available for data-driven governance strategies. The United Nations Global Pulse Programme harnesses big data and artificial intelligence to provide real-time insights on humanitarian and development challenges. The European Union’s Digital Single Market Strategy promotes cross-border data exchange to enhance policy efficiency across industries. These initiatives demonstrate how evidence-based decision-making strengthens governance, improves resource management, and drives sustainable development progress.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: In sub-Saharan Africa, weak statistical infrastructure and limited technological access hinder governments from using real-time data for policymaking. In South Asia, bureaucratic inefficiencies prevent the integration of data analytics into national development plans. Latin America struggles with inconsistent data transparency regulations, reducing the effectiveness of evidence-based governance. Conflict-affected regions, including parts of the Middle East and Central Africa, lack reliable data collection systems due to political instability and fragmented institutional frameworks. Strengthening statistical capacity, improving digital infrastructure, and fostering international cooperation would enhance the impact of data-driven decision-making in these regions.
Future challenges: Data accessibility inequalities prevent underserved regions from utilising evidence-based governance strategies. Technological barriers limit digital infrastructure necessary for advanced data analytics. Privacy concerns and cybersecurity risks create obstacles for transparent data-sharing initiatives. Institutional resistance from governments and corporations may slow the adoption of open data policies. Addressing these challenges requires strategic investments in digital infrastructure, data governance reforms, and international cooperation in knowledge-sharing platforms.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Improving statistical capacity-building is crucial for achieving Sustainable Development Goal 17.18, which emphasises the enhancement of data collection and analysis to support evidence-based policy development. Strong statistical systems enable governments, businesses, and international organisations to generate accurate, timely, and comprehensive data, ensuring that sustainable development initiatives are effectively monitored and evaluated. Investing in data infrastructure, strengthening institutional frameworks, and promoting collaboration between statistical agencies fosters transparency, improves decision-making, and enhances the ability of nations to track progress in achieving sustainability goals.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Paris21 Partnership, supported by the OECD and the World Bank, strengthens national statistical systems in low-income countries, ensuring reliable data collection for policy planning. The Global Data Lab provides analytical tools to assess economic and social indicators, empowering policymakers with actionable insights. The International Comparison Program (ICP) facilitates cross-country data harmonisation, enabling accurate global economic assessments. The United Nations Statistical Capacity Development Program assists nations in improving data collection, analysis, and dissemination practices through targeted training and technical assistance. These initiatives illustrate how statistical capacity-building enhances governance, strengthens accountability, and supports effective policy implementation.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: In sub-Saharan Africa, weak institutional frameworks and inadequate funding hinder data collection efforts, reducing the effectiveness of policy monitoring. In South Asia, fragmented statistical agencies prevent comprehensive data integration, limiting cross-sector collaboration. Latin America struggles with inconsistencies in data transparency, affecting economic and social planning accuracy. Conflict-affected regions, such as parts of the Middle East and Central Africa, face difficulties in maintaining statistical systems due to disruptions caused by instability and weak governance. Strengthening financial and technical support for statistical institutions in these regions would improve data reliability and drive sustainable development progress.
Future challenges: Limited funding for statistical agencies reduces the ability of governments to invest in high-quality data collection tools. Technological disparities prevent underserved regions from adopting advanced analytical frameworks for policy development. Political interference in data reporting affects transparency, reducing trust in official statistics. Inconsistent international standards for data collection and analysis hinder cross-country comparability, limiting collaborative efforts in global sustainability tracking. Addressing these challenges necessitates greater financial investment, standardisation of data methodologies, and strengthened institutional autonomy in statistical agencies.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Ensuring transparency and accountability is fundamental to achieving Sustainable Development Goal 17.18, which emphasises open access to development metrics. Transparent and accountable governance enables governments, businesses, and organisations to track progress, assess policy effectiveness, and foster public trust in sustainability initiatives. Open access to development data ensures that decision-making is informed by accurate, verifiable, and publicly available information. Strengthening mechanisms for data disclosure, regulatory oversight, and civic engagement enhances policy effectiveness, prevents corruption, and promotes equitable resource distribution, contributing to long-term sustainable development.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Open Government Partnership (OGP) enhances data accessibility by encouraging governments to publish economic, social, and environmental metrics for public scrutiny. The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) promotes financial transparency in resource-based economies, ensuring fair revenue distribution and reducing corruption. The World Bank’s BOOST Initiative provides open budget data to improve fiscal accountability in developing nations. The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) supports businesses in publicly disclosing sustainability performance metrics, enabling informed corporate decision-making. These programs demonstrate how transparency fosters trust, improves governance, and enhances policy impact.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: In sub-Saharan Africa, weak institutional frameworks and limited digital infrastructure hinder government efforts to publish reliable development metrics. In South Asia, bureaucratic inefficiencies slow the implementation of open data policies, reducing transparency in financial and environmental governance. Latin America experiences inconsistent regulatory enforcement, preventing full accountability in public sector spending and corporate sustainability practices. Conflict-affected regions, such as parts of the Middle East and Central Africa, struggle with suppressed data access due to political instability and restricted media freedom. Strengthening legal frameworks, digital accessibility, and public engagement mechanisms in these regions would improve transparency and accountability.
Future challenges: Data manipulation and misinformation undermine public trust in development metrics, reducing the effectiveness of open governance initiatives. Limited data literacy prevents communities from fully utilising publicly available development information. Political resistance to open data reforms can obstruct progress toward more accountable governance structures. Cybersecurity concerns create risks for digital transparency platforms, requiring advanced security frameworks to protect sensitive information. Addressing these challenges necessitates comprehensive data governance policies, international cooperation in cybersecurity, and education programs that enhance public understanding of development metrics.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
By 2030, build on existing initiatives to develop measurements of progress on sustainable development that complement gross domestic product, and support statistical capacity-building in developing countries
17.19.1 - Dollar value of all resources made available to strengthen statistical capacity in developing countries.
17.19.2 - Proportion of countries that (a) have conducted at least one population and housing census in the last 10 years; and (b) have achieved 100 per cent birth registration and 80 per cent death registration.
Relevance: Strengthening global progress tracking is essential for achieving Sustainable Development Goal 17.19, which focuses on improving the monitoring and evaluation of SDG achievements. Accurate, transparent, and comprehensive tracking mechanisms enable governments, organisations, and international institutions to assess sustainability progress, identify areas requiring further intervention, and allocate resources efficiently. By enhancing data collection, harmonising reporting methodologies, and fostering global cooperation, nations can ensure that development efforts are effectively measured and optimised for long-term success. Strong progress tracking systems also improve accountability, support evidence-based policymaking, and encourage cross-border collaboration to achieve sustainability goals.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The UN Sustainable Development Goals Indicator Framework provides standardised metrics for assessing sustainability achievements across different nations. The Global Sustainable Development Report (GSDR) synthesises policy recommendations and development metrics to guide governments in optimising sustainability strategies. The World Bank’s Development Data Group enhances data accessibility by compiling economic and social indicators for evidence-based decision-making. The SDG Tracker Platform, developed by international research institutions, provides an interactive online database for real-time monitoring of global progress on SDG targets. These programs illustrate how structured progress tracking strengthens accountability, improves resource allocation, and ensures that development efforts align with global sustainability objectives.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: In sub-Saharan Africa, weak data infrastructure and limited statistical capacity hinder accurate progress reporting. In South Asia, fragmented reporting mechanisms create inconsistencies in sustainability assessments, reducing the effectiveness of policy evaluation. Latin America struggles with gaps in institutional coordination, preventing cohesive implementation of global monitoring frameworks. Conflict-affected regions, including parts of the Middle East and Central Africa, experience disruptions in data collection due to instability, restricting governments from accurately measuring SDG progress. Strengthening technical expertise, expanding data accessibility, and fostering international collaborations can improve monitoring systems in these regions.
Future challenges: Data gaps and inconsistencies weaken the ability of governments to assess sustainability achievements comprehensively. Limited global alignment on reporting methodologies affects cross-country comparisons and progress evaluations. Technological disparities in data collection and analytics hinder efficient sustainability tracking. Political resistance in certain regions prevents full adoption of transparent monitoring mechanisms. Addressing these challenges requires enhanced international cooperation, advanced digital solutions for real-time data analytics, and standardised reporting frameworks to ensure reliable SDG tracking worldwide.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Improving consistency in sustainability reporting is vital for achieving Sustainable Development Goal 17.19, which focuses on strengthening global efforts to track sustainable development progress. Standardised metrics ensure that governments, businesses, and organisations use uniform indicators to assess economic, social, and environmental performance, facilitating cross-country comparisons and data-driven policy decisions. When sustainability reporting follows consistent methodologies, stakeholders can better evaluate the effectiveness of development strategies, enhance accountability, and optimise resource allocation. Strengthening standardised reporting frameworks improves global cooperation, prevents discrepancies in development data, and ensures transparency in sustainability efforts.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) provides a widely recognised framework for businesses and governments to disclose sustainability impacts, ensuring consistency in data collection. The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)establishes reporting standards for climate-related risks, enabling financial institutions to align investments with sustainability goals. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal Indicators Database sets globally agreed-upon metrics for tracking SDG achievements across regions and sectors. The International Integrated Reporting Framework (IIRC) promotes harmonised sustainability reporting for businesses, combining financial and environmental indicators to enhance corporate accountability. These programs demonstrate how standardised reporting fosters transparency, improves governance, and strengthens evidence-based policy-making.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: In sub-Saharan Africa, weak institutional frameworks and limited digital infrastructure prevent governments from harmonising sustainability data collection methodologies. In South Asia, fragmented environmental reporting practices hinder businesses and policymakers from effectively assessing progress toward sustainability goals. Latin America faces challenges in aligning national sustainability metrics with international reporting standards, leading to inconsistencies in development assessments. Conflict-affected regions, including parts of the Middle East and Central Africa, experience disruptions in data collection, preventing reliable sustainability tracking. Strengthening reporting frameworks, digital infrastructure, and institutional cooperation can improve the consistency of sustainability reporting in these regions.
Future challenges: Regulatory discrepancies between nations create inconsistencies in sustainability assessments. Limited data accessibility in developing regions prevents effective implementation of standardised reporting frameworks. Corporate resistance to adopting uniform sustainability metrics delays global alignment in reporting practices. Technological disparities hinder the development of digital platforms necessary for real-time sustainability tracking. Addressing these challenges requires regulatory harmonisation, international coordination, and digital innovations that enhance reporting consistency across sectors and borders.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
Relevance: Ensuring that policies align with future development goals is essential for achieving Sustainable Development Goal 17.19, which emphasises the importance of long-term impact assessment. Sustainable development requires forward-looking governance, where policies are designed not only to address present challenges but also to anticipate future needs. Effective long-term impact assessments allow governments, businesses, and organisations to measure the sustainability of their initiatives, ensuring resilience, adaptability, and lasting benefits for communities. By integrating future-oriented evaluations, policymakers can refine strategies, mitigate risks, and maintain steady progress toward global development objectives.
Examples of effective programs and initiatives: The UN Framework for Measuring Sustainable Development Impact provides standardised methodologies for evaluating the long-term effects of policies and projects. The OECD Future Policy Scenarios Program helps governments assess long-term economic and social risks, ensuring development strategies remain adaptable. The World Bank’s Long-Term Development Monitoring Framework supports nations in tracking the enduring impact of infrastructure, education, and environmental programs. The European Union’s Strategic Foresight Initiative integrates future-oriented analysis into policymaking, ensuring development objectives align with evolving global challenges. These programs illustrate how structured long-term impact assessments improve governance, optimise policy effectiveness, and support sustainable decision-making.
Regions where programs hold potential but are underdeveloped: In sub-Saharan Africa, inadequate statistical frameworks limit governments' ability to forecast future sustainability challenges. In South Asia, fragmented policy evaluation mechanisms hinder long-term planning efforts. Latin America faces difficulties in integrating future-oriented sustainability indicators into national development frameworks. Conflict-affected regions, including parts of the Middle East and Central Africa, struggle with disrupted governance structures, limiting strategic planning for long-term sustainability. Strengthening institutional frameworks, investing in data-driven policymaking, and fostering international knowledge-sharing can improve long-term impact assessments in these regions.
Future challenges: Expanding long-term impact assessment under SDG 17.19 faces several challenges. Short-term political cycles often prioritise immediate results over sustainability-focused planning. Lack of comprehensive forecasting tools reduces policymakers' ability to anticipate future risks. Economic and technological uncertainties complicate the integration of long-term sustainability considerations into policy frameworks. Weak governance structures in certain regions prevent effective adoption of future-oriented assessments. Overcoming these challenges requires improved institutional cooperation, investments in predictive analytics, and governance reforms that prioritise sustainability beyond short-term economic or political interests.
Policy recommendations based on economic conditions and resource levels:
All visual datasets have been sourced from Our World in Data.
Individual references for each dataset are currently being compiled and will be published on the site shortly